TY - JOUR
T1 - Youth experiences of co-designing a well-being intervention
T2 - reflections, learnings and recommendations
AU - Vella-Brodrick, Dianne
AU - Patrick, Kent
AU - Jacques-Hamilton, Rowan
AU - Ng, Amanda
AU - Chin, Tan Chyuan
AU - O’Connor, Meredith
AU - Rickard, Nikki
AU - Cross, Donna
AU - Hattie, John
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by an Australian Research Council Linkage Grant, under grant LP160100515 - Effects of Positive Education during the critical post-school transition. The authors wish to thank the Youth Advisors and focus group participants for their involvement in this project and for providing such valuable input into the design of the PTP. We would also like to acknowledge the Higgins family for their generous support in funding the Gerry Higgins Chair in Positive Psychology which is held by Professor Dianne Vella-Brodrick. Thanks also to all our project partners: Geelong Grammar School, Maroondah City Council and OELLEN, and the schools who helped to recruit the Youth Advisors.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2023/5/2
Y1 - 2023/5/2
N2 - Co-design and youth participatory action research are promising methodologies for increasing youth engagement in well-being interventions. The current study included 10 recent high school graduates employed as youth advisors to co-design a youth-friendly positive psychology intervention targeting the post-school transition. The youth advisors received foundational training in positive psychology, psychological needs theory and emerging adulthood. They held regular meetings to develop a Positive Transitions programme (PTP) text messaging intervention, informed by discussion of key themes, issues and relevant practical tips. This paper aims to examine the co-design process from the perspective of the youth advisors. Each youth advisor completed a survey, and six of the advisors also participated in a focus group exploring their co-design experiences. Youth advisors noted a range of personal benefits from the co-design experience including learning, enjoyment, teamwork, achievement, and pride. Areas for improvement included clarity of the project scope and the provision of support and feedback. Insights from this process are discussed, with the aim of guiding future work seeking to design youth-friendly well-being interventions.
AB - Co-design and youth participatory action research are promising methodologies for increasing youth engagement in well-being interventions. The current study included 10 recent high school graduates employed as youth advisors to co-design a youth-friendly positive psychology intervention targeting the post-school transition. The youth advisors received foundational training in positive psychology, psychological needs theory and emerging adulthood. They held regular meetings to develop a Positive Transitions programme (PTP) text messaging intervention, informed by discussion of key themes, issues and relevant practical tips. This paper aims to examine the co-design process from the perspective of the youth advisors. Each youth advisor completed a survey, and six of the advisors also participated in a focus group exploring their co-design experiences. Youth advisors noted a range of personal benefits from the co-design experience including learning, enjoyment, teamwork, achievement, and pride. Areas for improvement included clarity of the project scope and the provision of support and feedback. Insights from this process are discussed, with the aim of guiding future work seeking to design youth-friendly well-being interventions.
KW - co-design
KW - Positive psychology
KW - school transition
KW - well-being interventions
KW - young people
KW - youth participatory action research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85158820438&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/03054985.2023.2194621
DO - 10.1080/03054985.2023.2194621
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85158820438
SN - 0305-4985
VL - 49
SP - 838
EP - 857
JO - Oxford Review of Education
JF - Oxford Review of Education
IS - 6
ER -