Working Towards Integration of Personality Structure, Process, and Development RESPONSE

Anna Baumert; Manfred Schmitt; Marco Perugini; Wendy Johnson; Gabriela Blum; Peter Borkenau; Giulio Costantini; Jaap J. A. Denissen; William Fleeson; Ben Grafton; Eranda Jayawickreme; Elena Kurzius; Colin MacLeod; Lynn C. Miller; Stephen J. Read; Brent Roberts; Michael D. Robinson; Dustin Wood; Cornelia Wrzus

Working Towards Integration of Personality Structure, Process, and Development RESPONSE

Anna Baumert, Manfred Schmitt, Marco Perugini, Wendy Johnson, Gabriela Blum, Peter Borkenau, Giulio Costantini, Jaap J. A. Denissen, William Fleeson, Ben Grafton, Eranda Jayawickreme, Elena Kurzius, Colin MacLeod, Lynn C. Miller, Stephen J. Read, Brent Roberts, Michael D. Robinson, Dustin Wood, Cornelia Wrzus

School of Psychological Science

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › peer-review

2 Citations (Web of Science)

Abstract

Based on the thoughtful and thought-provoking comments, we strengthened some of the main proposals of our framework to integrate research on personality structure, process, and development. Integration is an important, yet challenging goal for personality science, and we see considerable potential for it, theoretically and in empirical research. We clarified our use of critical concepts, such as behaviour, trait, and personality structure. We suggest that avoiding use of broadly construed traits will be helpful in preventing circularity in explanations. Strictly speaking, we see no causal role for broadly construed traits. We discuss how observed structural differences between measures taken over different time scales or within and between individuals, can inform hypotheses about shared and unique causal mechanisms, and argue for the unique relevance of psychological processes in personality science. Copyright (C) 2017 European Association of Personality Psychology

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	577-595
Number of pages	19
Journal	European Journal of Personality
Volume	31
Issue number	5
Publication status	Published - 2017

Cite this

Baumert, A., Schmitt, M., Perugini, M., Johnson, W., Blum, G., Borkenau, P., Costantini, G., Denissen, J. J. A., Fleeson, W., Grafton, B., Jayawickreme, E., Kurzius, E., MacLeod, C., Miller, L. C., Read, S. J., Roberts, B., Robinson, M. D., Wood, D., & Wrzus, C. (2017). Working Towards Integration of Personality Structure, Process, and Development RESPONSE. European Journal of Personality, 31(5), 577-595.

@article{228861c20cbe443aae942ab11e2677db,

title = "Working Towards Integration of Personality Structure, Process, and Development RESPONSE",

abstract = "Based on the thoughtful and thought-provoking comments, we strengthened some of the main proposals of our framework to integrate research on personality structure, process, and development. Integration is an important, yet challenging goal for personality science, and we see considerable potential for it, theoretically and in empirical research. We clarified our use of critical concepts, such as behaviour, trait, and personality structure. We suggest that avoiding use of broadly construed traits will be helpful in preventing circularity in explanations. Strictly speaking, we see no causal role for broadly construed traits. We discuss how observed structural differences between measures taken over different time scales or within and between individuals, can inform hypotheses about shared and unique causal mechanisms, and argue for the unique relevance of psychological processes in personality science. Copyright (C) 2017 European Association of Personality Psychology",

keywords = "SELF-REGULATORY PROCESSES, BORDERLINE PERSONALITY, BIG 5, BEHAVIORAL SYNDROMES, AGGRESSIVE-BEHAVIOR, MENTAL-DISORDERS, NEGATIVE AFFECT, INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES, 5-FACTOR MODEL, INTERPERSONAL ASSESSMENT",

author = "Anna Baumert and Manfred Schmitt and Marco Perugini and Wendy Johnson and Gabriela Blum and Peter Borkenau and Giulio Costantini and Denissen, {Jaap J. A.} and William Fleeson and Ben Grafton and Eranda Jayawickreme and Elena Kurzius and Colin MacLeod and Miller, {Lynn C.} and Read, {Stephen J.} and Brent Roberts and Robinson, {Michael D.} and Dustin Wood and Cornelia Wrzus",

year = "2017",

language = "English",

volume = "31",

pages = "577--595",

journal = "European Journal of Personality",

issn = "0890-2070",

publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",

number = "5",

}

Baumert, A, Schmitt, M, Perugini, M, Johnson, W, Blum, G, Borkenau, P, Costantini, G, Denissen, JJA, Fleeson, W, Grafton, B, Jayawickreme, E, Kurzius, E, MacLeod, C, Miller, LC, Read, SJ, Roberts, B, Robinson, MD, Wood, D & Wrzus, C 2017, 'Working Towards Integration of Personality Structure, Process, and Development RESPONSE', European Journal of Personality, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 577-595.

TY - JOUR

T1 - Working Towards Integration of Personality Structure, Process, and Development RESPONSE

AU - Baumert, Anna

AU - Schmitt, Manfred

AU - Perugini, Marco

AU - Johnson, Wendy

AU - Blum, Gabriela

AU - Borkenau, Peter

AU - Costantini, Giulio

AU - Denissen, Jaap J. A.

AU - Fleeson, William

AU - Grafton, Ben

AU - Jayawickreme, Eranda

AU - Kurzius, Elena

AU - MacLeod, Colin

AU - Miller, Lynn C.

AU - Read, Stephen J.

AU - Roberts, Brent

AU - Robinson, Michael D.

AU - Wood, Dustin

AU - Wrzus, Cornelia

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Based on the thoughtful and thought-provoking comments, we strengthened some of the main proposals of our framework to integrate research on personality structure, process, and development. Integration is an important, yet challenging goal for personality science, and we see considerable potential for it, theoretically and in empirical research. We clarified our use of critical concepts, such as behaviour, trait, and personality structure. We suggest that avoiding use of broadly construed traits will be helpful in preventing circularity in explanations. Strictly speaking, we see no causal role for broadly construed traits. We discuss how observed structural differences between measures taken over different time scales or within and between individuals, can inform hypotheses about shared and unique causal mechanisms, and argue for the unique relevance of psychological processes in personality science. Copyright (C) 2017 European Association of Personality Psychology

AB - Based on the thoughtful and thought-provoking comments, we strengthened some of the main proposals of our framework to integrate research on personality structure, process, and development. Integration is an important, yet challenging goal for personality science, and we see considerable potential for it, theoretically and in empirical research. We clarified our use of critical concepts, such as behaviour, trait, and personality structure. We suggest that avoiding use of broadly construed traits will be helpful in preventing circularity in explanations. Strictly speaking, we see no causal role for broadly construed traits. We discuss how observed structural differences between measures taken over different time scales or within and between individuals, can inform hypotheses about shared and unique causal mechanisms, and argue for the unique relevance of psychological processes in personality science. Copyright (C) 2017 European Association of Personality Psychology

KW - SELF-REGULATORY PROCESSES

KW - BORDERLINE PERSONALITY

KW - BIG 5

KW - BEHAVIORAL SYNDROMES

KW - AGGRESSIVE-BEHAVIOR

KW - MENTAL-DISORDERS

KW - NEGATIVE AFFECT

KW - INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES

KW - 5-FACTOR MODEL

KW - INTERPERSONAL ASSESSMENT

M3 - Editorial

SN - 0890-2070

VL - 31

SP - 577

EP - 595

JO - European Journal of Personality

JF - European Journal of Personality

IS - 5

ER -

Working Towards Integration of Personality Structure, Process, and Development RESPONSE

Abstract

Fingerprint

Cite this