Working the 'spaces' between policy and practice: The contributions offered by resilience theory and action research

A.S. Hendrick, Susan Young

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The policy-practice dimension often presents challenges particularly in the policy arena of child well-being. Policy designers identify risk factors and design programmes intended to develop protective factors in areas of need. The 2004 Australian Communities for Children (CfC) initiative aimed to improve the social, health and educational outcomes for young children living in socio-economically disadvantaged localities. Its method was to engage local community members to contribute towards developing protective factors. Rather than considering this national-local arrangement, an unworkable alliance, we examine the performance of CfC through three examples and demonstrate how resilience theory and action research can assist this programme achieve its social inclusion aims and well-being outcomes. We choose not to disregard policy programmes like CfC, rather we emphasize the possibilities offered when working these complex spaces involving multiple and inherent contradictions. The spaces that often exist between the policy and its implementation are rethought to allow a greater opportunity for the growth of innovation and change. © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)179-188
JournalCHILD & FAMILY SOCIAL WORK
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Health Services Research
action research
resilience
community
child well-being
Vulnerable Populations
Child Welfare
well-being
inclusion
innovation
health
performance
Health
Growth
Protective Factors

Cite this

@article{9375a81aa1bf40618e1d20e663692ca3,
title = "Working the 'spaces' between policy and practice: The contributions offered by resilience theory and action research",
abstract = "The policy-practice dimension often presents challenges particularly in the policy arena of child well-being. Policy designers identify risk factors and design programmes intended to develop protective factors in areas of need. The 2004 Australian Communities for Children (CfC) initiative aimed to improve the social, health and educational outcomes for young children living in socio-economically disadvantaged localities. Its method was to engage local community members to contribute towards developing protective factors. Rather than considering this national-local arrangement, an unworkable alliance, we examine the performance of CfC through three examples and demonstrate how resilience theory and action research can assist this programme achieve its social inclusion aims and well-being outcomes. We choose not to disregard policy programmes like CfC, rather we emphasize the possibilities offered when working these complex spaces involving multiple and inherent contradictions. The spaces that often exist between the policy and its implementation are rethought to allow a greater opportunity for the growth of innovation and change. {\circledC} 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.",
author = "A.S. Hendrick and Susan Young",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2206.2011.00819.x",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "179--188",
journal = "CHILD & FAMILY SOCIAL WORK",
issn = "1356-7500",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Working the 'spaces' between policy and practice: The contributions offered by resilience theory and action research. / Hendrick, A.S.; Young, Susan.

In: CHILD & FAMILY SOCIAL WORK, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2013, p. 179-188.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Working the 'spaces' between policy and practice: The contributions offered by resilience theory and action research

AU - Hendrick, A.S.

AU - Young, Susan

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The policy-practice dimension often presents challenges particularly in the policy arena of child well-being. Policy designers identify risk factors and design programmes intended to develop protective factors in areas of need. The 2004 Australian Communities for Children (CfC) initiative aimed to improve the social, health and educational outcomes for young children living in socio-economically disadvantaged localities. Its method was to engage local community members to contribute towards developing protective factors. Rather than considering this national-local arrangement, an unworkable alliance, we examine the performance of CfC through three examples and demonstrate how resilience theory and action research can assist this programme achieve its social inclusion aims and well-being outcomes. We choose not to disregard policy programmes like CfC, rather we emphasize the possibilities offered when working these complex spaces involving multiple and inherent contradictions. The spaces that often exist between the policy and its implementation are rethought to allow a greater opportunity for the growth of innovation and change. © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

AB - The policy-practice dimension often presents challenges particularly in the policy arena of child well-being. Policy designers identify risk factors and design programmes intended to develop protective factors in areas of need. The 2004 Australian Communities for Children (CfC) initiative aimed to improve the social, health and educational outcomes for young children living in socio-economically disadvantaged localities. Its method was to engage local community members to contribute towards developing protective factors. Rather than considering this national-local arrangement, an unworkable alliance, we examine the performance of CfC through three examples and demonstrate how resilience theory and action research can assist this programme achieve its social inclusion aims and well-being outcomes. We choose not to disregard policy programmes like CfC, rather we emphasize the possibilities offered when working these complex spaces involving multiple and inherent contradictions. The spaces that often exist between the policy and its implementation are rethought to allow a greater opportunity for the growth of innovation and change. © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2011.00819.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2011.00819.x

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 179

EP - 188

JO - CHILD & FAMILY SOCIAL WORK

JF - CHILD & FAMILY SOCIAL WORK

SN - 1356-7500

IS - 2

ER -