Working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, and the continued influence effect: A latent-variable analysis

Christopher R. Brydges, Gilles E. Gignac, Ullrich K.H. Ecker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Misinformation often affects inferences and judgments even after it has been retracted and discredited. This is known as the continued influence effect. Memory processes have been theorized to contribute to the continued influence effect, and much previous research has focussed on the role of long-term memory processes at the time misinformation is retrieved during inferential reasoning and judgments. Recently, however, experimental research has focussed upon the role of working memory (WM) processes engaged in the updating and integration of information, when the retraction is encoded. From an individual differences perspective, susceptibility to continued influence effects should be predicted by a person's WM abilities, if continued reliance on misinformation is influenced, at least in part, by insufficient integration of the initial misinformation and its subsequent retraction. Consequently, we hypothesized that WM capacity would predict susceptibility to continued influence effects uniquely and more substantially than short-term memory (STM) capacity. Participants (N = 216) completed a continued-influence task, as well as a battery of WM and STM capacity tasks. Based on a latent variable model, our hypothesis was supported (WM capacity: β = −0.36, p =.013; STM capacity: β = 0.22, p =.187). Consequently, we suggest that low WM capacity is a measurable “risk factor” for continued reliance on misinformation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)117-122
Number of pages6
JournalIntelligence
Volume69
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2018

Fingerprint

Short-Term Memory
Communication
Short-term Memory
Working Memory Capacity
Aptitude
Long-Term Memory
Research
Individuality
Working Memory
Susceptibility
Reliance

Cite this

@article{f8f9fa3385a24cd185c40156971efb32,
title = "Working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, and the continued influence effect: A latent-variable analysis",
abstract = "Misinformation often affects inferences and judgments even after it has been retracted and discredited. This is known as the continued influence effect. Memory processes have been theorized to contribute to the continued influence effect, and much previous research has focussed on the role of long-term memory processes at the time misinformation is retrieved during inferential reasoning and judgments. Recently, however, experimental research has focussed upon the role of working memory (WM) processes engaged in the updating and integration of information, when the retraction is encoded. From an individual differences perspective, susceptibility to continued influence effects should be predicted by a person's WM abilities, if continued reliance on misinformation is influenced, at least in part, by insufficient integration of the initial misinformation and its subsequent retraction. Consequently, we hypothesized that WM capacity would predict susceptibility to continued influence effects uniquely and more substantially than short-term memory (STM) capacity. Participants (N = 216) completed a continued-influence task, as well as a battery of WM and STM capacity tasks. Based on a latent variable model, our hypothesis was supported (WM capacity: β = −0.36, p =.013; STM capacity: β = 0.22, p =.187). Consequently, we suggest that low WM capacity is a measurable “risk factor” for continued reliance on misinformation.",
keywords = "Continued influence effect, Individual differences, Short-term memory, Working memory",
author = "Brydges, {Christopher R.} and Gignac, {Gilles E.} and Ecker, {Ullrich K.H.}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.intell.2018.03.009",
language = "English",
volume = "69",
pages = "117--122",
journal = "Intelligence",
issn = "0160-2896",
publisher = "Academic Press",

}

Working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, and the continued influence effect : A latent-variable analysis. / Brydges, Christopher R.; Gignac, Gilles E.; Ecker, Ullrich K.H.

In: Intelligence, Vol. 69, 01.07.2018, p. 117-122.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, and the continued influence effect

T2 - A latent-variable analysis

AU - Brydges, Christopher R.

AU - Gignac, Gilles E.

AU - Ecker, Ullrich K.H.

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - Misinformation often affects inferences and judgments even after it has been retracted and discredited. This is known as the continued influence effect. Memory processes have been theorized to contribute to the continued influence effect, and much previous research has focussed on the role of long-term memory processes at the time misinformation is retrieved during inferential reasoning and judgments. Recently, however, experimental research has focussed upon the role of working memory (WM) processes engaged in the updating and integration of information, when the retraction is encoded. From an individual differences perspective, susceptibility to continued influence effects should be predicted by a person's WM abilities, if continued reliance on misinformation is influenced, at least in part, by insufficient integration of the initial misinformation and its subsequent retraction. Consequently, we hypothesized that WM capacity would predict susceptibility to continued influence effects uniquely and more substantially than short-term memory (STM) capacity. Participants (N = 216) completed a continued-influence task, as well as a battery of WM and STM capacity tasks. Based on a latent variable model, our hypothesis was supported (WM capacity: β = −0.36, p =.013; STM capacity: β = 0.22, p =.187). Consequently, we suggest that low WM capacity is a measurable “risk factor” for continued reliance on misinformation.

AB - Misinformation often affects inferences and judgments even after it has been retracted and discredited. This is known as the continued influence effect. Memory processes have been theorized to contribute to the continued influence effect, and much previous research has focussed on the role of long-term memory processes at the time misinformation is retrieved during inferential reasoning and judgments. Recently, however, experimental research has focussed upon the role of working memory (WM) processes engaged in the updating and integration of information, when the retraction is encoded. From an individual differences perspective, susceptibility to continued influence effects should be predicted by a person's WM abilities, if continued reliance on misinformation is influenced, at least in part, by insufficient integration of the initial misinformation and its subsequent retraction. Consequently, we hypothesized that WM capacity would predict susceptibility to continued influence effects uniquely and more substantially than short-term memory (STM) capacity. Participants (N = 216) completed a continued-influence task, as well as a battery of WM and STM capacity tasks. Based on a latent variable model, our hypothesis was supported (WM capacity: β = −0.36, p =.013; STM capacity: β = 0.22, p =.187). Consequently, we suggest that low WM capacity is a measurable “risk factor” for continued reliance on misinformation.

KW - Continued influence effect

KW - Individual differences

KW - Short-term memory

KW - Working memory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047816775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.intell.2018.03.009

DO - 10.1016/j.intell.2018.03.009

M3 - Article

VL - 69

SP - 117

EP - 122

JO - Intelligence

JF - Intelligence

SN - 0160-2896

ER -