TY - JOUR
T1 - With a little help from my friends
T2 - Developing an assisted automated peritoneal dialysis program in Western Australia
AU - Fortnum, Debbie
AU - Chakera, Aron
AU - Hawkins, Narelle
AU - Vandepeer, Gerrie
PY - 2017/11/1
Y1 - 2017/11/1
N2 - Background Nurse-assisted automated peritoneal dialysis (AAPD) offers a model of care that has been successfully used in frail dialysis populations internationally. AAPD offers cost savings over hospitalisation on peritoneal dialysis (PD) or in-centre haemodialysis (HD). Method A pilot AAPD model of care was developed in Western Australia (WA). Patient evaluation was measured utilising a perceptions of dialysis survey, clinical events, hospitalisation and peritonitis rates, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), KDQoL-SF 36 and a survey. Staff opinions and perceived competency were measured by an online survey. Economic analysis was undertaken. Results A successful collaborative model was developed. 40 staff were trained and competency significantly improved during program delivery (p<0.0001). 15 patients with an average CCI score of 8.7 used the service for 18 periods of care over 18 months (mean 33 days SD 47). Two non-renal cause deaths and two episodes of peritonitis occurred. Patient opinions were extremely positive. Cost savings were estimated at $620,000. Conclusion In WA, an AAPD pilot program has been successfully developed and delivered. A sustainable model has overcome initial hurdles. Staff have gained new skills and delivered effective care, demonstrated by high patient acceptance. The program was cost-effective compared to staying in hospital or transferring to HD.
AB - Background Nurse-assisted automated peritoneal dialysis (AAPD) offers a model of care that has been successfully used in frail dialysis populations internationally. AAPD offers cost savings over hospitalisation on peritoneal dialysis (PD) or in-centre haemodialysis (HD). Method A pilot AAPD model of care was developed in Western Australia (WA). Patient evaluation was measured utilising a perceptions of dialysis survey, clinical events, hospitalisation and peritonitis rates, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), KDQoL-SF 36 and a survey. Staff opinions and perceived competency were measured by an online survey. Economic analysis was undertaken. Results A successful collaborative model was developed. 40 staff were trained and competency significantly improved during program delivery (p<0.0001). 15 patients with an average CCI score of 8.7 used the service for 18 periods of care over 18 months (mean 33 days SD 47). Two non-renal cause deaths and two episodes of peritonitis occurred. Patient opinions were extremely positive. Cost savings were estimated at $620,000. Conclusion In WA, an AAPD pilot program has been successfully developed and delivered. A sustainable model has overcome initial hurdles. Staff have gained new skills and delivered effective care, demonstrated by high patient acceptance. The program was cost-effective compared to staying in hospital or transferring to HD.
KW - Assisted peritoneal dialysis
KW - Automated peritoneal dialysis
KW - Quality of life
KW - Staff education
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044530399&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85044530399
SN - 1832-3804
VL - 13
SP - 83
EP - 89
JO - Renal Society of Australasia Journal
JF - Renal Society of Australasia Journal
IS - 3
ER -