Why the Reward Structure of Science Makes Reproducibility Problems Inevitable

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)
75 Downloads (Pure)


Recent philosophical work has praised the reward structure of science, while recent empirical work has shown that many scientific results may not be reproducible. I argue that the reward structure of science incentivizes scientists to focus on speed and impact at the expense of the reproducibility of their work, thus contributing to the so-called reproducibility crisis. I use a rational choice model to identify a set of sufficient conditions for this problem to arise, and I argue that these conditions plausibly apply to a wide range of research situations. Currently proposed solutions will not fully address this problem. Philosophical commentators should temper their optimism about the reward structure of science.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)661-674
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Philosophy
Issue number12
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2018

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Why the Reward Structure of Science Makes Reproducibility Problems Inevitable'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this