Why The Incarnation is A Superfluous Detail for Kierkegaard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)171-175
Number of pages5
JournalReligious Studies
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 1982

Cite this

@article{ec28fd5a6b244d5d82836ca93cc914b1,
title = "Why The Incarnation is A Superfluous Detail for Kierkegaard",
author = "Levine, {Michael P.}",
year = "1982",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S0034412500013767",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "171--175",
journal = "Religious Studies: an international journal for the philosophy of religion and theology",
issn = "0034-4125",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

Why The Incarnation is A Superfluous Detail for Kierkegaard. / Levine, Michael P.

In: Religious Studies, Vol. 18, No. 2, 01.01.1982, p. 171-175.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why The Incarnation is A Superfluous Detail for Kierkegaard

AU - Levine, Michael P.

PY - 1982/1/1

Y1 - 1982/1/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84976041807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0034412500013767

DO - 10.1017/S0034412500013767

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 171

EP - 175

JO - Religious Studies: an international journal for the philosophy of religion and theology

JF - Religious Studies: an international journal for the philosophy of religion and theology

SN - 0034-4125

IS - 2

ER -