Abstract
The BBC’s action betrays a wider ambivalence to the right to be forgotten. But they would do well to recognise the dangers of the internet’s perpetual present.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Specialist publication | The Guardian |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jul 2015 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
BBC
ambivalence
Internet
present
Cite this
@misc{a12d155b3e4f4e3c8fa10dfc9d629fbe,
title = "Why the BBC is Wrong to Republish ‘Right to be Forgotten’ Links",
abstract = "The BBC’s action betrays a wider ambivalence to the right to be forgotten. But they would do well to recognise the dangers of the internet’s perpetual present.",
keywords = "right to be forgotten, Google",
author = "Julia Powles",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "1",
language = "English",
journal = "The Guardian",
publisher = "Guardiain News and Media Limited",
}
Why the BBC is Wrong to Republish ‘Right to be Forgotten’ Links. / Powles, Julia.
In: The Guardian, 01.07.2015.Research output: Contribution to specialist publication › Article
TY - GEN
T1 - Why the BBC is Wrong to Republish ‘Right to be Forgotten’ Links
AU - Powles, Julia
PY - 2015/7/1
Y1 - 2015/7/1
N2 - The BBC’s action betrays a wider ambivalence to the right to be forgotten. But they would do well to recognise the dangers of the internet’s perpetual present.
AB - The BBC’s action betrays a wider ambivalence to the right to be forgotten. But they would do well to recognise the dangers of the internet’s perpetual present.
KW - right to be forgotten
KW - Google
M3 - Article
JO - The Guardian
JF - The Guardian
ER -