Why Students Do Not Engage in Contract Cheating

Kiata Rundle, Guy Curtis, Joe Clare

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Contract cheating refers to students paying a third party to complete university assessments for them. Although opportunities for commercial contract cheating are widely available in the form of essay mills, only about 3% of students engage in this behaviour. This study examined the reasons why most students do not engage in contract cheating. Students (n = 1204) completed a survey on why they do not engage in contract cheating as well as measures of several individual differences, including self-control, grit and the Dark Triad traits. Morality and motivation for learning received the greatest endorsement for why students do not engage in contract cheating. Controlling for gender, individual differences predicted students’ reasons for not contract cheating. This study supports the use of criminological theories relating to rational choice, self-control and opportunity to explain why students do not engage in contract cheating. Practically, this study may inform academic policies and assessment design that may reduce contract cheating.
Original languageEnglish
Article number2229
Number of pages15
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume10
Issue number2229
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Oct 2019

Fingerprint

Contracts
Students
Individuality
Motivation
Learning

Cite this

@article{0014fa9caf014b28b077ac4cffe8acdb,
title = "Why Students Do Not Engage in Contract Cheating",
abstract = "Contract cheating refers to students paying a third party to complete university assessments for them. Although opportunities for commercial contract cheating are widely available in the form of essay mills, only about 3{\%} of students engage in this behaviour. This study examined the reasons why most students do not engage in contract cheating. Students (n = 1204) completed a survey on why they do not engage in contract cheating as well as measures of several individual differences, including self-control, grit and the Dark Triad traits. Morality and motivation for learning received the greatest endorsement for why students do not engage in contract cheating. Controlling for gender, individual differences predicted students’ reasons for not contract cheating. This study supports the use of criminological theories relating to rational choice, self-control and opportunity to explain why students do not engage in contract cheating. Practically, this study may inform academic policies and assessment design that may reduce contract cheating.",
keywords = "contract cheating, plagiarism, dark triad",
author = "Kiata Rundle and Guy Curtis and Joe Clare",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "4",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02229",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychology",
issn = "1664-1078",
publisher = "Frontiers Media SA",
number = "2229",

}

Why Students Do Not Engage in Contract Cheating. / Rundle, Kiata; Curtis, Guy; Clare, Joe.

In: Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 10, No. 2229, 2229, 04.10.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why Students Do Not Engage in Contract Cheating

AU - Rundle, Kiata

AU - Curtis, Guy

AU - Clare, Joe

PY - 2019/10/4

Y1 - 2019/10/4

N2 - Contract cheating refers to students paying a third party to complete university assessments for them. Although opportunities for commercial contract cheating are widely available in the form of essay mills, only about 3% of students engage in this behaviour. This study examined the reasons why most students do not engage in contract cheating. Students (n = 1204) completed a survey on why they do not engage in contract cheating as well as measures of several individual differences, including self-control, grit and the Dark Triad traits. Morality and motivation for learning received the greatest endorsement for why students do not engage in contract cheating. Controlling for gender, individual differences predicted students’ reasons for not contract cheating. This study supports the use of criminological theories relating to rational choice, self-control and opportunity to explain why students do not engage in contract cheating. Practically, this study may inform academic policies and assessment design that may reduce contract cheating.

AB - Contract cheating refers to students paying a third party to complete university assessments for them. Although opportunities for commercial contract cheating are widely available in the form of essay mills, only about 3% of students engage in this behaviour. This study examined the reasons why most students do not engage in contract cheating. Students (n = 1204) completed a survey on why they do not engage in contract cheating as well as measures of several individual differences, including self-control, grit and the Dark Triad traits. Morality and motivation for learning received the greatest endorsement for why students do not engage in contract cheating. Controlling for gender, individual differences predicted students’ reasons for not contract cheating. This study supports the use of criminological theories relating to rational choice, self-control and opportunity to explain why students do not engage in contract cheating. Practically, this study may inform academic policies and assessment design that may reduce contract cheating.

KW - contract cheating

KW - plagiarism

KW - dark triad

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02229

DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02229

M3 - Article

VL - 10

JO - Frontiers in Psychology

JF - Frontiers in Psychology

SN - 1664-1078

IS - 2229

M1 - 2229

ER -