Why Sexually Selected Weapons Are Not Ornaments

Erin L. McCullough, Christine W. Miller, Douglas J. Emlen

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    103 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The elaboration and diversification of sexually selected weapons remain poorly understood. We argue that progress in this topic has been hindered by a strong bias in sexual selection research, and a tendency for weapons to be conflated with ornaments used in mate choice. Here, we outline how male–male competition and female choice are distinct mechanisms of sexual selection, and why weapons and ornaments are fundamentally different types of traits. We call for research on the factors contributing to weapon divergence, the potential for male–male competition to drive speciation, and the specific use of weapons in the context of direct fights versus displays. Given that weapons are first and foremost fighting structures, biomechanical approaches are an especially promising direction for understanding weapon design.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)742-751
    Number of pages10
    JournalTrends in Ecology and Evolution
    Volume31
    Issue number10
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2016

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Why Sexually Selected Weapons Are Not Ornaments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this