Why " Conserve " ? S

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference paperChapter

Abstract

The language of archaeological “conservation” is often passive, officious, and removed from conditions on the ground. The fundamental question—why conserve?—is seldom asked. Yet it is often assumed a priori that conservation is both necessary and beneficial. In the reflexive spirit of regularly questioning accepted practices, this paper situates “conservation” at three southern African rock art sites. These sites help to foreground indigenous notions of materiality and history that both embrace and eschew curatorial intervention. They also
speak of imperial, colonial, and apartheid pasts that carry their burdens into the present. Finally, restoring to prominence the role of the present, along with conservation’s benefits to the past and the future, offers multiple temporal, spatial, and cultural perspectives that situate conservation as a set of negotiated,
evolving practices.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationOf the past, for the future
Subtitle of host publication Integrating archaeology and conservation
EditorsJanet Bridgeland, Neville Agnew
Place of PublicationLos Angeles
PublisherThe Getty Conservation Institute
Pages346-351
Number of pages6
ISBN (Print)0892368268
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Publication series

NameProceedings of the conservation theme at the 5th World Archaeological Congress, Washington, D.C., 22-26 June 2003

Fingerprint

conservation
present
apartheid
art
history
language

Cite this

Ouzman, S. (2006). Why " Conserve " ? S. In J. Bridgeland, & N. Agnew (Eds.), Of the past, for the future: Integrating archaeology and conservation (pp. 346-351). (Proceedings of the conservation theme at the 5th World Archaeological Congress, Washington, D.C., 22-26 June 2003). Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute.
Ouzman, Sven. / Why " Conserve " ? S. Of the past, for the future: Integrating archaeology and conservation. editor / Janet Bridgeland ; Neville Agnew. Los Angeles : The Getty Conservation Institute, 2006. pp. 346-351 (Proceedings of the conservation theme at the 5th World Archaeological Congress, Washington, D.C., 22-26 June 2003).
@inbook{9bc1b45ad3d1492397bb82f80bead7af,
title = "Why {"} Conserve {"} ? S",
abstract = "The language of archaeological “conservation” is often passive, officious, and removed from conditions on the ground. The fundamental question—why conserve?—is seldom asked. Yet it is often assumed a priori that conservation is both necessary and beneficial. In the reflexive spirit of regularly questioning accepted practices, this paper situates “conservation” at three southern African rock art sites. These sites help to foreground indigenous notions of materiality and history that both embrace and eschew curatorial intervention. They alsospeak of imperial, colonial, and apartheid pasts that carry their burdens into the present. Finally, restoring to prominence the role of the present, along with conservation’s benefits to the past and the future, offers multiple temporal, spatial, and cultural perspectives that situate conservation as a set of negotiated,evolving practices.",
keywords = "Archaeology, Rock art, Conservation, Southern Africa, Museums",
author = "Sven Ouzman",
year = "2006",
language = "English",
isbn = "0892368268",
series = "Proceedings of the conservation theme at the 5th World Archaeological Congress, Washington, D.C., 22-26 June 2003",
publisher = "The Getty Conservation Institute",
pages = "346--351",
editor = "Janet Bridgeland and Agnew, {Neville }",
booktitle = "Of the past, for the future",

}

Ouzman, S 2006, Why " Conserve " ? S. in J Bridgeland & N Agnew (eds), Of the past, for the future: Integrating archaeology and conservation. Proceedings of the conservation theme at the 5th World Archaeological Congress, Washington, D.C., 22-26 June 2003, The Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles, pp. 346-351.

Why " Conserve " ? S. / Ouzman, Sven.

Of the past, for the future: Integrating archaeology and conservation. ed. / Janet Bridgeland; Neville Agnew. Los Angeles : The Getty Conservation Institute, 2006. p. 346-351 (Proceedings of the conservation theme at the 5th World Archaeological Congress, Washington, D.C., 22-26 June 2003).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference paperChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Why " Conserve " ? S

AU - Ouzman, Sven

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - The language of archaeological “conservation” is often passive, officious, and removed from conditions on the ground. The fundamental question—why conserve?—is seldom asked. Yet it is often assumed a priori that conservation is both necessary and beneficial. In the reflexive spirit of regularly questioning accepted practices, this paper situates “conservation” at three southern African rock art sites. These sites help to foreground indigenous notions of materiality and history that both embrace and eschew curatorial intervention. They alsospeak of imperial, colonial, and apartheid pasts that carry their burdens into the present. Finally, restoring to prominence the role of the present, along with conservation’s benefits to the past and the future, offers multiple temporal, spatial, and cultural perspectives that situate conservation as a set of negotiated,evolving practices.

AB - The language of archaeological “conservation” is often passive, officious, and removed from conditions on the ground. The fundamental question—why conserve?—is seldom asked. Yet it is often assumed a priori that conservation is both necessary and beneficial. In the reflexive spirit of regularly questioning accepted practices, this paper situates “conservation” at three southern African rock art sites. These sites help to foreground indigenous notions of materiality and history that both embrace and eschew curatorial intervention. They alsospeak of imperial, colonial, and apartheid pasts that carry their burdens into the present. Finally, restoring to prominence the role of the present, along with conservation’s benefits to the past and the future, offers multiple temporal, spatial, and cultural perspectives that situate conservation as a set of negotiated,evolving practices.

KW - Archaeology

KW - Rock art

KW - Conservation

KW - Southern Africa

KW - Museums

M3 - Chapter

SN - 0892368268

T3 - Proceedings of the conservation theme at the 5th World Archaeological Congress, Washington, D.C., 22-26 June 2003

SP - 346

EP - 351

BT - Of the past, for the future

A2 - Bridgeland, Janet

A2 - Agnew, Neville

PB - The Getty Conservation Institute

CY - Los Angeles

ER -

Ouzman S. Why " Conserve " ? S. In Bridgeland J, Agnew N, editors, Of the past, for the future: Integrating archaeology and conservation. Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute. 2006. p. 346-351. (Proceedings of the conservation theme at the 5th World Archaeological Congress, Washington, D.C., 22-26 June 2003).