Whose backyard? Some precautions in choosing recipient sites for assisted colonisation of Australian plants and animals

S.J. Harris, Sophie Arnall, M. Byrne, D.J. Coates, M.W. Hayward, T.G. Martin, Nicki Mitchell, S.T. Garnett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In cases where assisted colonisation is the appropriate conservation tool, the selection of recipient sites is a major challenge. Here, we propose a framework for site selection that can be applied to the Australian biota, where planning for assisted colonisation is in its infancy. Characteristics that will be important drivers in the decision-making process include the size of a recipient site, the potential to augment corridors and respond to niche gaps, the maximisation of climatic buffering, bioregional similarity, tenure security, and the minimisation of opportunities for hybridisation and invasiveness. Sites we suggest be precluded from assisted colonisation include sites of high species endemism, IUCN category 1 reference reserves and fully-functioning threatened ecological communities. © 2013 Ecological Society of Australia.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)106-111
JournalEcological Management and Restoration
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Whose backyard? Some precautions in choosing recipient sites for assisted colonisation of Australian plants and animals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this