When does proactivity have a cost? Motivation at work moderates the effects of proactive work behavior on employee job strain

Karoline Strauss, Sharon K. Parker, Deirdre O'Shea

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The literature on proactivity has focused primarily on its positive performance outcomes. However, the effects of proactive behavior on employees’ well-being are relatively unknown. We theorize that when an individuals’ motivation at work is characterized by pressure and coercion (high controlled motivation), with no compensatory intrinsic interest in or identification with the work (low autonomous motivation), proactive behavior is likely to deplete employees’ resources, resulting in job strain. We tested this proposition in a lagged study of 127 employee-supervisor dyads across a variety of sectors. As expected, supervisor-rated proactive work behavior was positively associated with job strain when controlled motivation was high and when autonomous motivation was also low. Under all other conditions, there was no effect of proactive behavior on job strain. For example, when individuals experienced high controlled motivation yet also experienced autonomous motivation, there was no effect of proactive behavior on job strain. In sum, proactive behavior has costs in terms of job strain only when employees experience a sense of pressure and obligation in their work in the absence of any compensating autonomous motivation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)15-26
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Vocational Behavior
Volume100
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2017

Fingerprint

employee
Costs and Cost Analysis
costs
Coercion
Pressure
Proactivity
Work behavior
Proactive behavior
Job strain
Costs
Employees
dyad
obligation
well-being
resources
Supervisors
performance
experience

Cite this

@article{c950f8034de143589876ddbfa3c3b8c0,
title = "When does proactivity have a cost? Motivation at work moderates the effects of proactive work behavior on employee job strain",
abstract = "The literature on proactivity has focused primarily on its positive performance outcomes. However, the effects of proactive behavior on employees’ well-being are relatively unknown. We theorize that when an individuals’ motivation at work is characterized by pressure and coercion (high controlled motivation), with no compensatory intrinsic interest in or identification with the work (low autonomous motivation), proactive behavior is likely to deplete employees’ resources, resulting in job strain. We tested this proposition in a lagged study of 127 employee-supervisor dyads across a variety of sectors. As expected, supervisor-rated proactive work behavior was positively associated with job strain when controlled motivation was high and when autonomous motivation was also low. Under all other conditions, there was no effect of proactive behavior on job strain. For example, when individuals experienced high controlled motivation yet also experienced autonomous motivation, there was no effect of proactive behavior on job strain. In sum, proactive behavior has costs in terms of job strain only when employees experience a sense of pressure and obligation in their work in the absence of any compensating autonomous motivation.",
keywords = "Job strain, Motivation, Proactive behavior, Self-determination theory",
author = "Karoline Strauss and Parker, {Sharon K.} and Deirdre O'Shea",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jvb.2017.02.001",
language = "English",
volume = "100",
pages = "15--26",
journal = "Journal of Vocational Behavior",
issn = "0001-8791",
publisher = "Academic Press",

}

When does proactivity have a cost? Motivation at work moderates the effects of proactive work behavior on employee job strain. / Strauss, Karoline; Parker, Sharon K.; O'Shea, Deirdre.

In: Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 100, 01.06.2017, p. 15-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - When does proactivity have a cost? Motivation at work moderates the effects of proactive work behavior on employee job strain

AU - Strauss, Karoline

AU - Parker, Sharon K.

AU - O'Shea, Deirdre

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - The literature on proactivity has focused primarily on its positive performance outcomes. However, the effects of proactive behavior on employees’ well-being are relatively unknown. We theorize that when an individuals’ motivation at work is characterized by pressure and coercion (high controlled motivation), with no compensatory intrinsic interest in or identification with the work (low autonomous motivation), proactive behavior is likely to deplete employees’ resources, resulting in job strain. We tested this proposition in a lagged study of 127 employee-supervisor dyads across a variety of sectors. As expected, supervisor-rated proactive work behavior was positively associated with job strain when controlled motivation was high and when autonomous motivation was also low. Under all other conditions, there was no effect of proactive behavior on job strain. For example, when individuals experienced high controlled motivation yet also experienced autonomous motivation, there was no effect of proactive behavior on job strain. In sum, proactive behavior has costs in terms of job strain only when employees experience a sense of pressure and obligation in their work in the absence of any compensating autonomous motivation.

AB - The literature on proactivity has focused primarily on its positive performance outcomes. However, the effects of proactive behavior on employees’ well-being are relatively unknown. We theorize that when an individuals’ motivation at work is characterized by pressure and coercion (high controlled motivation), with no compensatory intrinsic interest in or identification with the work (low autonomous motivation), proactive behavior is likely to deplete employees’ resources, resulting in job strain. We tested this proposition in a lagged study of 127 employee-supervisor dyads across a variety of sectors. As expected, supervisor-rated proactive work behavior was positively associated with job strain when controlled motivation was high and when autonomous motivation was also low. Under all other conditions, there was no effect of proactive behavior on job strain. For example, when individuals experienced high controlled motivation yet also experienced autonomous motivation, there was no effect of proactive behavior on job strain. In sum, proactive behavior has costs in terms of job strain only when employees experience a sense of pressure and obligation in their work in the absence of any compensating autonomous motivation.

KW - Job strain

KW - Motivation

KW - Proactive behavior

KW - Self-determination theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013055839&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jvb.2017.02.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jvb.2017.02.001

M3 - Article

VL - 100

SP - 15

EP - 26

JO - Journal of Vocational Behavior

JF - Journal of Vocational Behavior

SN - 0001-8791

ER -