TY - JOUR
T1 - What is attention bias variability? Examining the potential roles of attention control and response time variability in its relationship with anxiety
AU - Clarke, Patrick J.F.
AU - Marinovic, Welber
AU - Todd, Jemma
AU - Basanovic, Julian
AU - Chen, Nigel T.M.
AU - Notebaert, Lies
PY - 2020/12
Y1 - 2020/12
N2 - The present study examined the underlying role of attention control and response time variability in explaining the relationship between anxiety and two commonly computed measures of attention bias variability: ‘moving average’ and ‘trial-level bias score’ measures. Participants (final n = 195) completed measures of anxiety symptomatology, antisaccade performance (attention control), a stand-alone measure of response-time variability, and a probe task measure of attention bias. Average bias and moving average bias variability measures both recorded significant, but low split-half reliability. Both attention bias variability measures and average attention bias were associated with anxiety, and attention control. Both attention bias variability measures correlated with response time variability. Neither attention bias variability measure correlated with average attention bias. Attention control was the single significant mediator of the relationship between anxiety and the trial-level bias score measure of attention bias variability. Neither response time variability nor attention control significantly mediated the relationship between anxiety and the moving average measure of attention bias variability. No evidence was found for the mediating role of response time variability. The present findings suggest that the relationships observed between anxiety and the trial-level bias score measure of attention bias variability in particular may be attributable to the over-arching role of attention control.
AB - The present study examined the underlying role of attention control and response time variability in explaining the relationship between anxiety and two commonly computed measures of attention bias variability: ‘moving average’ and ‘trial-level bias score’ measures. Participants (final n = 195) completed measures of anxiety symptomatology, antisaccade performance (attention control), a stand-alone measure of response-time variability, and a probe task measure of attention bias. Average bias and moving average bias variability measures both recorded significant, but low split-half reliability. Both attention bias variability measures and average attention bias were associated with anxiety, and attention control. Both attention bias variability measures correlated with response time variability. Neither attention bias variability measure correlated with average attention bias. Attention control was the single significant mediator of the relationship between anxiety and the trial-level bias score measure of attention bias variability. Neither response time variability nor attention control significantly mediated the relationship between anxiety and the moving average measure of attention bias variability. No evidence was found for the mediating role of response time variability. The present findings suggest that the relationships observed between anxiety and the trial-level bias score measure of attention bias variability in particular may be attributable to the over-arching role of attention control.
KW - Attention bias
KW - Attention bias dynamics
KW - Attention bias variability
KW - Cognitive bias
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092706102&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.brat.2020.103751
DO - 10.1016/j.brat.2020.103751
M3 - Article
C2 - 33070010
AN - SCOPUS:85092706102
SN - 0005-7967
VL - 135
JO - Behaviour Research and Therapy
JF - Behaviour Research and Therapy
M1 - 103751
ER -