Abstract
This article examines whether New Delhi’s engagement with the ongoing conflict in Syria (and Iraq) demonstrates that India is leaving behind its traditionally cautious and risk-averse foreign policy stance and becoming a more proactive international actor. India has not engaged actively with and has not tried to wield substantial influence over the course of this conflict; instead, after a moderate burst of diplomatic activity in the second half of 2011 India has largely tried to avoid involvement. There are some indications that India is trying to become more proactive in its region, in trade diplomacy, and toward a rising China; yet, results sometimes fail to meet ambitions. Accordingly, the article concludes that, on balance, India’s foreign policy orientation has not yet changed significantly; it remains a cautious, reactive international actor unwilling to engage with and actively shape the outcome of crucial crises or conflicts.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 209-241 |
| Number of pages | 33 |
| Journal | India Review |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 15 Mar 2018 |
Fingerprint
Cite this
}
What does New Delhi’s engagement with the war in Syria (and Iraq) reveal about India as an international actor? / Bloomfield, Alan.
In: India Review, Vol. 17, No. 2, 15.03.2018, p. 209-241.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - What does New Delhi’s engagement with the war in Syria (and Iraq) reveal about India as an international actor?
AU - Bloomfield, Alan
PY - 2018/3/15
Y1 - 2018/3/15
N2 - This article examines whether New Delhi’s engagement with the ongoing conflict in Syria (and Iraq) demonstrates that India is leaving behind its traditionally cautious and risk-averse foreign policy stance and becoming a more proactive international actor. India has not engaged actively with and has not tried to wield substantial influence over the course of this conflict; instead, after a moderate burst of diplomatic activity in the second half of 2011 India has largely tried to avoid involvement. There are some indications that India is trying to become more proactive in its region, in trade diplomacy, and toward a rising China; yet, results sometimes fail to meet ambitions. Accordingly, the article concludes that, on balance, India’s foreign policy orientation has not yet changed significantly; it remains a cautious, reactive international actor unwilling to engage with and actively shape the outcome of crucial crises or conflicts.
AB - This article examines whether New Delhi’s engagement with the ongoing conflict in Syria (and Iraq) demonstrates that India is leaving behind its traditionally cautious and risk-averse foreign policy stance and becoming a more proactive international actor. India has not engaged actively with and has not tried to wield substantial influence over the course of this conflict; instead, after a moderate burst of diplomatic activity in the second half of 2011 India has largely tried to avoid involvement. There are some indications that India is trying to become more proactive in its region, in trade diplomacy, and toward a rising China; yet, results sometimes fail to meet ambitions. Accordingly, the article concludes that, on balance, India’s foreign policy orientation has not yet changed significantly; it remains a cautious, reactive international actor unwilling to engage with and actively shape the outcome of crucial crises or conflicts.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046289027&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14736489.2018.1452414
DO - 10.1080/14736489.2018.1452414
M3 - Article
VL - 17
SP - 209
EP - 241
JO - India Review
JF - India Review
SN - 1473-6489
IS - 2
ER -