What cause employees to whistle while they work? Factors affecting internal whistle-blowing in the Australian Public Service

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

What cause employees in the Australian Public Service (APS) to internally blow the whistle on corruption in the workplace? This research examines the impact of the nature of corruption, organisational culture, and employees’ work attitudes and actions on internal whistle-blowing in the APS. The respondents were found to internally blow the whistle for most types of corruption: fraud, conflict of interest, unlawful disclosure of government information, and perverting the course of justice. Their whistle-blowing behaviour was, however, unaffected by observations of theft of official assets. They were also unlikely to report observations of cronyism and nepotism. Active observers of workplace bullying (those who have blown the whistle after witnessing someone else being bullied) were three times more likely to also internally report corruption than inactive observers of bullying.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAustralian Journal of Public Administration
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

corruption
public service
employee
cause
exclusion
workplace
larceny
conflict of interest
organizational culture
fraud
assets
justice

Cite this

@article{307cdc08b9b043dd9197216458ae41ff,
title = "What cause employees to whistle while they work? Factors affecting internal whistle-blowing in the Australian Public Service",
abstract = "What cause employees in the Australian Public Service (APS) to internally blow the whistle on corruption in the workplace? This research examines the impact of the nature of corruption, organisational culture, and employees’ work attitudes and actions on internal whistle-blowing in the APS. The respondents were found to internally blow the whistle for most types of corruption: fraud, conflict of interest, unlawful disclosure of government information, and perverting the course of justice. Their whistle-blowing behaviour was, however, unaffected by observations of theft of official assets. They were also unlikely to report observations of cronyism and nepotism. Active observers of workplace bullying (those who have blown the whistle after witnessing someone else being bullied) were three times more likely to also internally report corruption than inactive observers of bullying.",
keywords = "corruption, cronyism, nepotism, organisational culture, whistle-blowing",
author = "Jeannette Taylor",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1467-8500.12401",
language = "English",
journal = "Australian Journal of Public Administration",
issn = "0313-6647",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What cause employees to whistle while they work? Factors affecting internal whistle-blowing in the Australian Public Service

AU - Taylor, Jeannette

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - What cause employees in the Australian Public Service (APS) to internally blow the whistle on corruption in the workplace? This research examines the impact of the nature of corruption, organisational culture, and employees’ work attitudes and actions on internal whistle-blowing in the APS. The respondents were found to internally blow the whistle for most types of corruption: fraud, conflict of interest, unlawful disclosure of government information, and perverting the course of justice. Their whistle-blowing behaviour was, however, unaffected by observations of theft of official assets. They were also unlikely to report observations of cronyism and nepotism. Active observers of workplace bullying (those who have blown the whistle after witnessing someone else being bullied) were three times more likely to also internally report corruption than inactive observers of bullying.

AB - What cause employees in the Australian Public Service (APS) to internally blow the whistle on corruption in the workplace? This research examines the impact of the nature of corruption, organisational culture, and employees’ work attitudes and actions on internal whistle-blowing in the APS. The respondents were found to internally blow the whistle for most types of corruption: fraud, conflict of interest, unlawful disclosure of government information, and perverting the course of justice. Their whistle-blowing behaviour was, however, unaffected by observations of theft of official assets. They were also unlikely to report observations of cronyism and nepotism. Active observers of workplace bullying (those who have blown the whistle after witnessing someone else being bullied) were three times more likely to also internally report corruption than inactive observers of bullying.

KW - corruption

KW - cronyism

KW - nepotism

KW - organisational culture

KW - whistle-blowing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074483255&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1467-8500.12401

DO - 10.1111/1467-8500.12401

M3 - Article

JO - Australian Journal of Public Administration

JF - Australian Journal of Public Administration

SN - 0313-6647

ER -