What catch data can tell us about the status of global fisheries

Rainer Froese, Dirk Zeller, Kristin Kleisner, Daniel Pauly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

101 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The only available data set on the catches of global fisheries are the official landings reported annually by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Attempts to detect and interpret trends in these data have been criticized as being both technically and conceptually flawed. Here, we explore and refute these claims. We show explicitly that trends in catch data are not an artifact of the applied method and are consistent with trends in biomass data of fully assessed stocks. We also show that, while comprehensive stock assessments are the preferred method for evaluating single stocks, they are a biased subsample of the stocks in a given area, strongly underestimating the percentage of collapsed stocks. We concur with a recent assessment-based analysis by FAO that the increasing trends in the percentage of overexploited, depleted, and recovering stocks and the decreasing trends in underexploited and moderately exploited stocks give cause for concern. We show that these trends are much more pronounced if all available data are considered.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1283-1292
Number of pages10
JournalMarine Biology
Volume159
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

catch statistics
fishery
fisheries
Food and Agriculture Organization
United Nations
Food and Agricultural Organization
biomass
methodology
stock assessment
artifact
trend
agriculture
food

Cite this

Froese, Rainer ; Zeller, Dirk ; Kleisner, Kristin ; Pauly, Daniel. / What catch data can tell us about the status of global fisheries. In: Marine Biology. 2012 ; Vol. 159, No. 6. pp. 1283-1292.
@article{0a676eb7a24d4e6292bfdea6c7b444b1,
title = "What catch data can tell us about the status of global fisheries",
abstract = "The only available data set on the catches of global fisheries are the official landings reported annually by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Attempts to detect and interpret trends in these data have been criticized as being both technically and conceptually flawed. Here, we explore and refute these claims. We show explicitly that trends in catch data are not an artifact of the applied method and are consistent with trends in biomass data of fully assessed stocks. We also show that, while comprehensive stock assessments are the preferred method for evaluating single stocks, they are a biased subsample of the stocks in a given area, strongly underestimating the percentage of collapsed stocks. We concur with a recent assessment-based analysis by FAO that the increasing trends in the percentage of overexploited, depleted, and recovering stocks and the decreasing trends in underexploited and moderately exploited stocks give cause for concern. We show that these trends are much more pronounced if all available data are considered.",
author = "Rainer Froese and Dirk Zeller and Kristin Kleisner and Daniel Pauly",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s00227-012-1909-6",
language = "English",
volume = "159",
pages = "1283--1292",
journal = "Marine Biology",
issn = "0025-3162",
publisher = "Springer Heidelberg",
number = "6",

}

What catch data can tell us about the status of global fisheries. / Froese, Rainer; Zeller, Dirk; Kleisner, Kristin; Pauly, Daniel.

In: Marine Biology, Vol. 159, No. 6, 06.2012, p. 1283-1292.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - What catch data can tell us about the status of global fisheries

AU - Froese, Rainer

AU - Zeller, Dirk

AU - Kleisner, Kristin

AU - Pauly, Daniel

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - The only available data set on the catches of global fisheries are the official landings reported annually by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Attempts to detect and interpret trends in these data have been criticized as being both technically and conceptually flawed. Here, we explore and refute these claims. We show explicitly that trends in catch data are not an artifact of the applied method and are consistent with trends in biomass data of fully assessed stocks. We also show that, while comprehensive stock assessments are the preferred method for evaluating single stocks, they are a biased subsample of the stocks in a given area, strongly underestimating the percentage of collapsed stocks. We concur with a recent assessment-based analysis by FAO that the increasing trends in the percentage of overexploited, depleted, and recovering stocks and the decreasing trends in underexploited and moderately exploited stocks give cause for concern. We show that these trends are much more pronounced if all available data are considered.

AB - The only available data set on the catches of global fisheries are the official landings reported annually by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Attempts to detect and interpret trends in these data have been criticized as being both technically and conceptually flawed. Here, we explore and refute these claims. We show explicitly that trends in catch data are not an artifact of the applied method and are consistent with trends in biomass data of fully assessed stocks. We also show that, while comprehensive stock assessments are the preferred method for evaluating single stocks, they are a biased subsample of the stocks in a given area, strongly underestimating the percentage of collapsed stocks. We concur with a recent assessment-based analysis by FAO that the increasing trends in the percentage of overexploited, depleted, and recovering stocks and the decreasing trends in underexploited and moderately exploited stocks give cause for concern. We show that these trends are much more pronounced if all available data are considered.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860635776&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00227-012-1909-6

DO - 10.1007/s00227-012-1909-6

M3 - Article

VL - 159

SP - 1283

EP - 1292

JO - Marine Biology

JF - Marine Biology

SN - 0025-3162

IS - 6

ER -