What are We Mainstreaming When We Mainstream Gender?

Joan Eveline, C. Bacchi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

78 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the policies and practices of gender mainstreaming, gender itself is a contested concept. This article examines versions of gender mainstreaming in two countries, focusing on approaches we term the Canadian and Netherlands models. We show how different understandings of gender are attached to different reform approaches, and intimate how particular ways of conceptualising gender inhibit the efficacy of the mainstreaming strategy. In order to increase that effectiveness we suggest that gender mainstreaming models incorporate a view of gender as a verb rather than as a noun, so that the focus is on the processes of gendering rather than on the static category of ‘gender’. We make the argument that such a shift could: a) incorporate a feminist ontology of the body; b) align an understanding of gender as an unfinished process with the ways in which those who make and implement policy experience gender mainstreaming as always partial and incomplete.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)496-512
JournalInternational Feminist Journal of Politics
Volume7
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint

gender mainstreaming
gender
ontology
Netherlands
reform
experience

Cite this

Eveline, Joan ; Bacchi, C. / What are We Mainstreaming When We Mainstream Gender?. In: International Feminist Journal of Politics. 2005 ; Vol. 7, No. 4. pp. 496-512.
@article{ee86b3ee19db46c2b8f14e322f89780c,
title = "What are We Mainstreaming When We Mainstream Gender?",
abstract = "In the policies and practices of gender mainstreaming, gender itself is a contested concept. This article examines versions of gender mainstreaming in two countries, focusing on approaches we term the Canadian and Netherlands models. We show how different understandings of gender are attached to different reform approaches, and intimate how particular ways of conceptualising gender inhibit the efficacy of the mainstreaming strategy. In order to increase that effectiveness we suggest that gender mainstreaming models incorporate a view of gender as a verb rather than as a noun, so that the focus is on the processes of gendering rather than on the static category of ‘gender’. We make the argument that such a shift could: a) incorporate a feminist ontology of the body; b) align an understanding of gender as an unfinished process with the ways in which those who make and implement policy experience gender mainstreaming as always partial and incomplete.",
author = "Joan Eveline and C. Bacchi",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1080/14616740500284417",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "496--512",
journal = "International Feminist Journal of Politics",
issn = "1461-6742",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

What are We Mainstreaming When We Mainstream Gender? / Eveline, Joan; Bacchi, C.

In: International Feminist Journal of Politics, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2005, p. 496-512.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - What are We Mainstreaming When We Mainstream Gender?

AU - Eveline, Joan

AU - Bacchi, C.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - In the policies and practices of gender mainstreaming, gender itself is a contested concept. This article examines versions of gender mainstreaming in two countries, focusing on approaches we term the Canadian and Netherlands models. We show how different understandings of gender are attached to different reform approaches, and intimate how particular ways of conceptualising gender inhibit the efficacy of the mainstreaming strategy. In order to increase that effectiveness we suggest that gender mainstreaming models incorporate a view of gender as a verb rather than as a noun, so that the focus is on the processes of gendering rather than on the static category of ‘gender’. We make the argument that such a shift could: a) incorporate a feminist ontology of the body; b) align an understanding of gender as an unfinished process with the ways in which those who make and implement policy experience gender mainstreaming as always partial and incomplete.

AB - In the policies and practices of gender mainstreaming, gender itself is a contested concept. This article examines versions of gender mainstreaming in two countries, focusing on approaches we term the Canadian and Netherlands models. We show how different understandings of gender are attached to different reform approaches, and intimate how particular ways of conceptualising gender inhibit the efficacy of the mainstreaming strategy. In order to increase that effectiveness we suggest that gender mainstreaming models incorporate a view of gender as a verb rather than as a noun, so that the focus is on the processes of gendering rather than on the static category of ‘gender’. We make the argument that such a shift could: a) incorporate a feminist ontology of the body; b) align an understanding of gender as an unfinished process with the ways in which those who make and implement policy experience gender mainstreaming as always partial and incomplete.

U2 - 10.1080/14616740500284417

DO - 10.1080/14616740500284417

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 496

EP - 512

JO - International Feminist Journal of Politics

JF - International Feminist Journal of Politics

SN - 1461-6742

IS - 4

ER -