TY - JOUR
T1 - Wellbeing, values, and planning in environmental management
AU - Wallace, Ken J.
AU - Jago, Mark
AU - Pannell, David J.
AU - Kim, Milena Kiatkoski
PY - 2021/1/1
Y1 - 2021/1/1
N2 - Concepts of ‘human values’ and ‘wellbeing’ are central in environmental planning, especially during the group deliberations that underpin expert and participatory processes. However, there are long-standing, unresolved controversies concerning both concepts with many debates being highly theoretical. Therefore, we suggest it is more productive to develop definitions and models that are task-specific (mid-level theory). To this end, we use purpose-built value sets and models to explain the relationships among values and wellbeing, and to demarcate values, desires, and personality. The derived concepts are designed for group deliberations and could readily be combined with existing decision support tools, such as structured decision making. Outputs from the work also inform current debates within the environmental domain including, for example, those surrounding the intrinsic value of nature, and ideas concerning plural values versus a single overarching value (monism). We also define ‘wellbeing’ as an evaluative statement that supports assessments of trade-offs and co-benefits.
AB - Concepts of ‘human values’ and ‘wellbeing’ are central in environmental planning, especially during the group deliberations that underpin expert and participatory processes. However, there are long-standing, unresolved controversies concerning both concepts with many debates being highly theoretical. Therefore, we suggest it is more productive to develop definitions and models that are task-specific (mid-level theory). To this end, we use purpose-built value sets and models to explain the relationships among values and wellbeing, and to demarcate values, desires, and personality. The derived concepts are designed for group deliberations and could readily be combined with existing decision support tools, such as structured decision making. Outputs from the work also inform current debates within the environmental domain including, for example, those surrounding the intrinsic value of nature, and ideas concerning plural values versus a single overarching value (monism). We also define ‘wellbeing’ as an evaluative statement that supports assessments of trade-offs and co-benefits.
KW - Decision-making
KW - Natural resources
KW - Participatory processes
KW - Principles
KW - Values
KW - Wellbeing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092017180&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111447
DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111447
M3 - Article
C2 - 33035941
AN - SCOPUS:85092017180
SN - 0301-4797
VL - 277
JO - Journal of Environmental Management
JF - Journal of Environmental Management
M1 - 111447
ER -