Waste, Power, and Hegemony: A Critical Analysis of the Wastescape of Sri Lanka

Randika Jayasinghe, Michael Azariadis, Caroline Baillie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article explores the power dynamics that shape the wastescape of Sri Lanka. Using theories of power and hegemony, we investigate how the discourses of expert knowledge and formal waste management processes marginalize the discourses and practices of the informal waste sector. By analyzing these discourses and practices, we demonstrate how legitimate and authoritative knowledge is constructed. The analysis uncovered five themes that frame the dominant model of waste management in Sri Lanka: (a) the discourse of development, (b) expert systems, (c) political decision-making, (d) coercion and alienation, and (e) removal of waste. We demonstrate that small-scale informal waste management can be both a solution to Sri Lanka’s waste problem and a much needed income source for the poor. Thus, instead of alienation, coercion, and exclusion, informal waste workers should be recognized as valuable contributors of the urban wastescape to create a sustainable wastescape in the country.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)173-195
JournalJournal of Environment and Development
Volume28
Issue number2
Early online date6 Jan 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2019

Fingerprint

hegemony
critical analysis
Sri Lanka
waste management
discourse
alienation
political decision making
expert knowledge
knowledge-based system
expert system
exclusion
decision making
income
worker

Cite this

@article{4344e5ee16e041b5ad4baf78fda1e989,
title = "Waste, Power, and Hegemony: A Critical Analysis of the Wastescape of Sri Lanka",
abstract = "This article explores the power dynamics that shape the wastescape of Sri Lanka. Using theories of power and hegemony, we investigate how the discourses of expert knowledge and formal waste management processes marginalize the discourses and practices of the informal waste sector. By analyzing these discourses and practices, we demonstrate how legitimate and authoritative knowledge is constructed. The analysis uncovered five themes that frame the dominant model of waste management in Sri Lanka: (a) the discourse of development, (b) expert systems, (c) political decision-making, (d) coercion and alienation, and (e) removal of waste. We demonstrate that small-scale informal waste management can be both a solution to Sri Lanka’s waste problem and a much needed income source for the poor. Thus, instead of alienation, coercion, and exclusion, informal waste workers should be recognized as valuable contributors of the urban wastescape to create a sustainable wastescape in the country.",
keywords = "informal sector, power, recycling, Sri Lanka, waste",
author = "Randika Jayasinghe and Michael Azariadis and Caroline Baillie",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1177/1070496518821722",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "173--195",
journal = "Journal of Environment & Development",
issn = "1070-4965",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Waste, Power, and Hegemony : A Critical Analysis of the Wastescape of Sri Lanka. / Jayasinghe, Randika; Azariadis, Michael; Baillie, Caroline.

In: Journal of Environment and Development, Vol. 28, No. 2, 06.2019, p. 173-195.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Waste, Power, and Hegemony

T2 - A Critical Analysis of the Wastescape of Sri Lanka

AU - Jayasinghe, Randika

AU - Azariadis, Michael

AU - Baillie, Caroline

PY - 2019/6

Y1 - 2019/6

N2 - This article explores the power dynamics that shape the wastescape of Sri Lanka. Using theories of power and hegemony, we investigate how the discourses of expert knowledge and formal waste management processes marginalize the discourses and practices of the informal waste sector. By analyzing these discourses and practices, we demonstrate how legitimate and authoritative knowledge is constructed. The analysis uncovered five themes that frame the dominant model of waste management in Sri Lanka: (a) the discourse of development, (b) expert systems, (c) political decision-making, (d) coercion and alienation, and (e) removal of waste. We demonstrate that small-scale informal waste management can be both a solution to Sri Lanka’s waste problem and a much needed income source for the poor. Thus, instead of alienation, coercion, and exclusion, informal waste workers should be recognized as valuable contributors of the urban wastescape to create a sustainable wastescape in the country.

AB - This article explores the power dynamics that shape the wastescape of Sri Lanka. Using theories of power and hegemony, we investigate how the discourses of expert knowledge and formal waste management processes marginalize the discourses and practices of the informal waste sector. By analyzing these discourses and practices, we demonstrate how legitimate and authoritative knowledge is constructed. The analysis uncovered five themes that frame the dominant model of waste management in Sri Lanka: (a) the discourse of development, (b) expert systems, (c) political decision-making, (d) coercion and alienation, and (e) removal of waste. We demonstrate that small-scale informal waste management can be both a solution to Sri Lanka’s waste problem and a much needed income source for the poor. Thus, instead of alienation, coercion, and exclusion, informal waste workers should be recognized as valuable contributors of the urban wastescape to create a sustainable wastescape in the country.

KW - informal sector

KW - power

KW - recycling

KW - Sri Lanka

KW - waste

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059897245&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1070496518821722

DO - 10.1177/1070496518821722

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 173

EP - 195

JO - Journal of Environment & Development

JF - Journal of Environment & Development

SN - 1070-4965

IS - 2

ER -