War, Politics and Race

Saul Newman, Michael Levine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The authors argue that the 'war on terror' marks the ultimate convergence of war with politics, and the virtual collapse of any meaningful distinction between them. Not only does it signify the breakdown of international relations norms but also the militarization of internal life and political discourse. They explore the 'genealogy' of this situation firstly through the notion of the 'state of exception'—in which sovereign violence becomes indistinct from the law that is supposed to curtail it—and secondly through Foucault's idea that politics is essentially a form of warfare. They suggest that these two ways of approaching the question of violence can only be understood through a racist dimension, which forms the hidden underside of the 'war on terrorism'. In other words, our contemporary situation is characterized by the mobilization not only of fundamentalist and conservative ideologies, but, increasingly, racial antagonisms and prejudices directed towards the Muslim other.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)23-49
JournalTheoria: a journal of social and political theory
Volume53
Issue number110
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

politics
terrorism
violence
militarization
antagonism
warfare
genealogy
prejudice
Ideologies
international relations
mobilization
Muslim
Law
discourse

Cite this

@article{41e529f9bdf24707a52250f77496fe1b,
title = "War, Politics and Race",
abstract = "The authors argue that the 'war on terror' marks the ultimate convergence of war with politics, and the virtual collapse of any meaningful distinction between them. Not only does it signify the breakdown of international relations norms but also the militarization of internal life and political discourse. They explore the 'genealogy' of this situation firstly through the notion of the 'state of exception'—in which sovereign violence becomes indistinct from the law that is supposed to curtail it—and secondly through Foucault's idea that politics is essentially a form of warfare. They suggest that these two ways of approaching the question of violence can only be understood through a racist dimension, which forms the hidden underside of the 'war on terrorism'. In other words, our contemporary situation is characterized by the mobilization not only of fundamentalist and conservative ideologies, but, increasingly, racial antagonisms and prejudices directed towards the Muslim other.",
author = "Saul Newman and Michael Levine",
year = "2006",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "23--49",
journal = "Theoria: a journal of social and political theory",
issn = "0040-5817",
number = "110",

}

War, Politics and Race. / Newman, Saul; Levine, Michael.

In: Theoria: a journal of social and political theory, Vol. 53, No. 110, 2006, p. 23-49.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - War, Politics and Race

AU - Newman, Saul

AU - Levine, Michael

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - The authors argue that the 'war on terror' marks the ultimate convergence of war with politics, and the virtual collapse of any meaningful distinction between them. Not only does it signify the breakdown of international relations norms but also the militarization of internal life and political discourse. They explore the 'genealogy' of this situation firstly through the notion of the 'state of exception'—in which sovereign violence becomes indistinct from the law that is supposed to curtail it—and secondly through Foucault's idea that politics is essentially a form of warfare. They suggest that these two ways of approaching the question of violence can only be understood through a racist dimension, which forms the hidden underside of the 'war on terrorism'. In other words, our contemporary situation is characterized by the mobilization not only of fundamentalist and conservative ideologies, but, increasingly, racial antagonisms and prejudices directed towards the Muslim other.

AB - The authors argue that the 'war on terror' marks the ultimate convergence of war with politics, and the virtual collapse of any meaningful distinction between them. Not only does it signify the breakdown of international relations norms but also the militarization of internal life and political discourse. They explore the 'genealogy' of this situation firstly through the notion of the 'state of exception'—in which sovereign violence becomes indistinct from the law that is supposed to curtail it—and secondly through Foucault's idea that politics is essentially a form of warfare. They suggest that these two ways of approaching the question of violence can only be understood through a racist dimension, which forms the hidden underside of the 'war on terrorism'. In other words, our contemporary situation is characterized by the mobilization not only of fundamentalist and conservative ideologies, but, increasingly, racial antagonisms and prejudices directed towards the Muslim other.

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 23

EP - 49

JO - Theoria: a journal of social and political theory

JF - Theoria: a journal of social and political theory

SN - 0040-5817

IS - 110

ER -