Viscosity and density of common anaesthetic gases: implications for flow measurements

W. Habre, T. Asztalos, Peter Sly, F. Petak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although viscosity (g) is a crucial factor in measurements of flow with a pneumotachograph, and density (p) also plays a role in the presence of turbulent flow, these material constants are not available for the volatile anaesthetic agents commonly administered in clinical practice. Thus, we determined experimentally la and p of pure volatile anaesthetic agents. Input impedance of a rigid-wall polyethylene tube (Zt) was measured when the tube was filled with various mixtures of carrier gases (air, 100% oxygen, 50% oxygen+50% nitrogen) to which different concentrations of volatile anaesthetic inhalation agents (halothane, isoflurane, sevoflurane, and desflurane) had been added. lt and p were calculated from real and imaginary portions of Zt, respectively, using the appropriate physical equations. Multiple linear regression was applied to estimate lt and p of pure volatile agents. Viscosity values of pure volatile agents were markedly lower than those for oxygen or nitrogen. Clinically applied concentrations, however, did not markedly affect the viscosity of the gas mixture (maximum of 3.5% decrease in lt for 2 MAC desflurane). In contrast, all of the volatile agents significantly affected p even at routinely used concentrations. Our results suggest that the composition of the carrier gas has a greater impact on viscosity than the amount and nature of the volatile anaesthetic agent whereas density is more influenced by volatile agent concentrations. Thus, the need for a correction factor in flow measurements with a pneumotachograph depends far more on the carrier gas than the concentration of volatile agent administered, although the latter may play a role in particular experimental or clinical settings.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)602-607
JournalBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
Volume87
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001

    Fingerprint

Cite this