Viability trade-offs in the evaluation of strategies to manage recreational fishing in a marine park

Olivier Thebaud, Nick Ellis, L. Richard Little, Luc Doyen, Ross J. Marriott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Management strategy evaluation (MSE) is an analytical process used to evaluate alternative strategies for the management of renewable resource systems against explicitly stated objectives using a dynamic simulation framework. A key pre-requisite of MSE involves turning broad conceptual objectives into quantifiable and measurable operational objectives, against which the performance of management strategies can be assessed in simulations. However, given the large uncertainty typical of many renewable resource management problems and the potential diversity of stakeholder interests and needs, specification of operational management objectives for MSE often proves a challenge. In this article, a new approach to the evaluation of multidimensional outputs from MSE modeling, taking into account uncertainty regarding the reference levels of performance indicators (PIs) is proposed. The approach uses the notion of viable management strategies, as defined in recent applications of viable control to marine social-ecological systems, to examine the way in which simulated operational management objectives can be set. In this context, "viable" management strategies are defined as those which allow reference levels for candidate PIs to be met at some pre-agreed levels of tolerance, and we consider the possibility for these reference levels to be uncertain. The approach is applied to the multidimensional set of results from an MSE study conducted on recreational fishing for spangled emperor (Lethrinus nebulosus) in the Ningaloo Marine Park of Western Australia. The analysis shows how the complexities in management arrangements on recreational fishing, combining spatial management restrictions on fishing as well as conventional fisheries management regulations, which the MSE model accounted for in a multidimensional set of simulation results, can be synthesized using viability analysis. Results point to the existence of management options which provide greater "room to move", in setting reference and tolerance levels, for the range of objectives identified by stakeholders. Beyond the application to Ningaloo Reef, the approach could be transferrable to any other simulation-based outcomes of MSE for natural resource systems, both marine and land-based. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)59-69
JournalEcological Indicators
Volume46
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

sport fishing
marine park
fishing
viability
Lethrinus nebulosus
renewable resources
evaluation
Management strategy
Trade-offs
Recreational fishing
Viability
Evaluation
renewable resource
stakeholders
uncertainty
simulation
stakeholder
tolerance
natural resource management
fisheries management

Cite this

Thebaud, Olivier ; Ellis, Nick ; Little, L. Richard ; Doyen, Luc ; Marriott, Ross J. / Viability trade-offs in the evaluation of strategies to manage recreational fishing in a marine park. In: Ecological Indicators. 2014 ; Vol. 46. pp. 59-69.
@article{a3398ebe857f47f080136410ab4f8c6b,
title = "Viability trade-offs in the evaluation of strategies to manage recreational fishing in a marine park",
abstract = "Management strategy evaluation (MSE) is an analytical process used to evaluate alternative strategies for the management of renewable resource systems against explicitly stated objectives using a dynamic simulation framework. A key pre-requisite of MSE involves turning broad conceptual objectives into quantifiable and measurable operational objectives, against which the performance of management strategies can be assessed in simulations. However, given the large uncertainty typical of many renewable resource management problems and the potential diversity of stakeholder interests and needs, specification of operational management objectives for MSE often proves a challenge. In this article, a new approach to the evaluation of multidimensional outputs from MSE modeling, taking into account uncertainty regarding the reference levels of performance indicators (PIs) is proposed. The approach uses the notion of viable management strategies, as defined in recent applications of viable control to marine social-ecological systems, to examine the way in which simulated operational management objectives can be set. In this context, {"}viable{"} management strategies are defined as those which allow reference levels for candidate PIs to be met at some pre-agreed levels of tolerance, and we consider the possibility for these reference levels to be uncertain. The approach is applied to the multidimensional set of results from an MSE study conducted on recreational fishing for spangled emperor (Lethrinus nebulosus) in the Ningaloo Marine Park of Western Australia. The analysis shows how the complexities in management arrangements on recreational fishing, combining spatial management restrictions on fishing as well as conventional fisheries management regulations, which the MSE model accounted for in a multidimensional set of simulation results, can be synthesized using viability analysis. Results point to the existence of management options which provide greater {"}room to move{"}, in setting reference and tolerance levels, for the range of objectives identified by stakeholders. Beyond the application to Ningaloo Reef, the approach could be transferrable to any other simulation-based outcomes of MSE for natural resource systems, both marine and land-based. {\circledC} 2014 Elsevier Ltd.",
author = "Olivier Thebaud and Nick Ellis and Little, {L. Richard} and Luc Doyen and Marriott, {Ross J.}",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.05.013",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "59--69",
journal = "Ecological Indicators",
issn = "1470-160X",
publisher = "Pergamon",

}

Viability trade-offs in the evaluation of strategies to manage recreational fishing in a marine park. / Thebaud, Olivier; Ellis, Nick; Little, L. Richard; Doyen, Luc; Marriott, Ross J.

In: Ecological Indicators, Vol. 46, 11.2014, p. 59-69.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Viability trade-offs in the evaluation of strategies to manage recreational fishing in a marine park

AU - Thebaud, Olivier

AU - Ellis, Nick

AU - Little, L. Richard

AU - Doyen, Luc

AU - Marriott, Ross J.

PY - 2014/11

Y1 - 2014/11

N2 - Management strategy evaluation (MSE) is an analytical process used to evaluate alternative strategies for the management of renewable resource systems against explicitly stated objectives using a dynamic simulation framework. A key pre-requisite of MSE involves turning broad conceptual objectives into quantifiable and measurable operational objectives, against which the performance of management strategies can be assessed in simulations. However, given the large uncertainty typical of many renewable resource management problems and the potential diversity of stakeholder interests and needs, specification of operational management objectives for MSE often proves a challenge. In this article, a new approach to the evaluation of multidimensional outputs from MSE modeling, taking into account uncertainty regarding the reference levels of performance indicators (PIs) is proposed. The approach uses the notion of viable management strategies, as defined in recent applications of viable control to marine social-ecological systems, to examine the way in which simulated operational management objectives can be set. In this context, "viable" management strategies are defined as those which allow reference levels for candidate PIs to be met at some pre-agreed levels of tolerance, and we consider the possibility for these reference levels to be uncertain. The approach is applied to the multidimensional set of results from an MSE study conducted on recreational fishing for spangled emperor (Lethrinus nebulosus) in the Ningaloo Marine Park of Western Australia. The analysis shows how the complexities in management arrangements on recreational fishing, combining spatial management restrictions on fishing as well as conventional fisheries management regulations, which the MSE model accounted for in a multidimensional set of simulation results, can be synthesized using viability analysis. Results point to the existence of management options which provide greater "room to move", in setting reference and tolerance levels, for the range of objectives identified by stakeholders. Beyond the application to Ningaloo Reef, the approach could be transferrable to any other simulation-based outcomes of MSE for natural resource systems, both marine and land-based. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd.

AB - Management strategy evaluation (MSE) is an analytical process used to evaluate alternative strategies for the management of renewable resource systems against explicitly stated objectives using a dynamic simulation framework. A key pre-requisite of MSE involves turning broad conceptual objectives into quantifiable and measurable operational objectives, against which the performance of management strategies can be assessed in simulations. However, given the large uncertainty typical of many renewable resource management problems and the potential diversity of stakeholder interests and needs, specification of operational management objectives for MSE often proves a challenge. In this article, a new approach to the evaluation of multidimensional outputs from MSE modeling, taking into account uncertainty regarding the reference levels of performance indicators (PIs) is proposed. The approach uses the notion of viable management strategies, as defined in recent applications of viable control to marine social-ecological systems, to examine the way in which simulated operational management objectives can be set. In this context, "viable" management strategies are defined as those which allow reference levels for candidate PIs to be met at some pre-agreed levels of tolerance, and we consider the possibility for these reference levels to be uncertain. The approach is applied to the multidimensional set of results from an MSE study conducted on recreational fishing for spangled emperor (Lethrinus nebulosus) in the Ningaloo Marine Park of Western Australia. The analysis shows how the complexities in management arrangements on recreational fishing, combining spatial management restrictions on fishing as well as conventional fisheries management regulations, which the MSE model accounted for in a multidimensional set of simulation results, can be synthesized using viability analysis. Results point to the existence of management options which provide greater "room to move", in setting reference and tolerance levels, for the range of objectives identified by stakeholders. Beyond the application to Ningaloo Reef, the approach could be transferrable to any other simulation-based outcomes of MSE for natural resource systems, both marine and land-based. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd.

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.05.013

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.05.013

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 59

EP - 69

JO - Ecological Indicators

JF - Ecological Indicators

SN - 1470-160X

ER -