Verbalizing facial memory: criterion effects in verbal overshadowing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article investigated the role of the recognition criterion in the verbal overshadowing effect (VOE). In 3 experiments, people witnessed an event, verbally described a perpetrator, and then attempted identification. The authors found in Experiment 1, which included a "not present" response option and both perpetrator-present (PP) and perpetrator-absent (PA) lineups, an increased reluctance to identify a person from both lineup types after verbalization. Experiment 2 incorporated a forced-choice procedure, and the authors found no effect of verbalization on identification performance. Experiment 3 replicated the essential aspects of these results. Consequently, the VOE may reflect a change in recognition criterion rather than a changed processing style or alteration of the underlying memory trace. This conclusion was confirmed by computational modeling of the data. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)739-755
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Fingerprint

experiment
present
human being
Experiment
Recognition (Psychology)
event
performance
Perpetrators
Verbalization
Person
Alteration
Computational Modeling
Memory Trace

Cite this

@article{8760addda0c6457d8d42d70649506571,
title = "Verbalizing facial memory: criterion effects in verbal overshadowing",
abstract = "This article investigated the role of the recognition criterion in the verbal overshadowing effect (VOE). In 3 experiments, people witnessed an event, verbally described a perpetrator, and then attempted identification. The authors found in Experiment 1, which included a {"}not present{"} response option and both perpetrator-present (PP) and perpetrator-absent (PA) lineups, an increased reluctance to identify a person from both lineup types after verbalization. Experiment 2 incorporated a forced-choice procedure, and the authors found no effect of verbalization on identification performance. Experiment 3 replicated the essential aspects of these results. Consequently, the VOE may reflect a change in recognition criterion rather than a changed processing style or alteration of the underlying memory trace. This conclusion was confirmed by computational modeling of the data. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)",
author = "Joseph Clare and Stephan Lewandowsky",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1037/0278-7393.30.4.739",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "739--755",
journal = "JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION",
issn = "0278-7393",
publisher = "AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Verbalizing facial memory: criterion effects in verbal overshadowing

AU - Clare, Joseph

AU - Lewandowsky, Stephan

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - This article investigated the role of the recognition criterion in the verbal overshadowing effect (VOE). In 3 experiments, people witnessed an event, verbally described a perpetrator, and then attempted identification. The authors found in Experiment 1, which included a "not present" response option and both perpetrator-present (PP) and perpetrator-absent (PA) lineups, an increased reluctance to identify a person from both lineup types after verbalization. Experiment 2 incorporated a forced-choice procedure, and the authors found no effect of verbalization on identification performance. Experiment 3 replicated the essential aspects of these results. Consequently, the VOE may reflect a change in recognition criterion rather than a changed processing style or alteration of the underlying memory trace. This conclusion was confirmed by computational modeling of the data. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)

AB - This article investigated the role of the recognition criterion in the verbal overshadowing effect (VOE). In 3 experiments, people witnessed an event, verbally described a perpetrator, and then attempted identification. The authors found in Experiment 1, which included a "not present" response option and both perpetrator-present (PP) and perpetrator-absent (PA) lineups, an increased reluctance to identify a person from both lineup types after verbalization. Experiment 2 incorporated a forced-choice procedure, and the authors found no effect of verbalization on identification performance. Experiment 3 replicated the essential aspects of these results. Consequently, the VOE may reflect a change in recognition criterion rather than a changed processing style or alteration of the underlying memory trace. This conclusion was confirmed by computational modeling of the data. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)

U2 - 10.1037/0278-7393.30.4.739

DO - 10.1037/0278-7393.30.4.739

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 739

EP - 755

JO - JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION

JF - JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION

SN - 0278-7393

IS - 4

ER -