Variations in the care of agitated patients in Australia and New Zealand ambulance services

Dhanya Nambiar, James W. Pearce, Janet Bray, Michael Stephenson, Ziad Nehme, Stacey Masters, Deon Brink, Karen Smith, Glenn Arendts, Daniel Fatovich, Stephen Bernard, Brian Haskins, Hugh Grantham, Peter Cameron

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective The objective of the present study is to examine variations in paramedic care of the agitated patient, including verbal de-escalation, physical restraint and sedation, provided by ambulance services in Australia and New Zealand. Methods To examine the care of agitated patients, we first identified and reviewed all clinical practice guidelines for the management of agitated patients in Australian and New Zealand ambulance services between September and November 2018. We then conducted a structured questionnaire to obtain further information on the training, assessment and care of agitated patients by the ambulance services. Two authors extracted the data independently, and all interpretations and results were reviewed and confirmed by relevant ambulance services. Results There were 10 independent clinical practice guidelines for the care of agitated patients in the 10 ambulance services. All services reported training in the management of agitated patients, and two services used a validated tool to assess the level of agitation. All services used physical restraint, although six services required police presence to restrain the patient. All ambulance services used some form of sedation, typically divided into the management of mild to moderate, and severe agitation. The most common agent for sedation was midazolam, while ketamine was the most common agent for sedating severely agitated patients. The maximum dose was varied, and contraindications for sedating agents varied between services. Conclusions There were wide variations across the ambulance services in terms of the assessment of agitation, as well as the use of physical restraint and sedation.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages8
JournalEmergency Medicine Australasia
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 15 Dec 2019

Cite this

Nambiar, Dhanya ; Pearce, James W. ; Bray, Janet ; Stephenson, Michael ; Nehme, Ziad ; Masters, Stacey ; Brink, Deon ; Smith, Karen ; Arendts, Glenn ; Fatovich, Daniel ; Bernard, Stephen ; Haskins, Brian ; Grantham, Hugh ; Cameron, Peter. / Variations in the care of agitated patients in Australia and New Zealand ambulance services. In: Emergency Medicine Australasia. 2019.
@article{a14ea2e8186f494393ac68e46b598b1f,
title = "Variations in the care of agitated patients in Australia and New Zealand ambulance services",
abstract = "Objective The objective of the present study is to examine variations in paramedic care of the agitated patient, including verbal de-escalation, physical restraint and sedation, provided by ambulance services in Australia and New Zealand. Methods To examine the care of agitated patients, we first identified and reviewed all clinical practice guidelines for the management of agitated patients in Australian and New Zealand ambulance services between September and November 2018. We then conducted a structured questionnaire to obtain further information on the training, assessment and care of agitated patients by the ambulance services. Two authors extracted the data independently, and all interpretations and results were reviewed and confirmed by relevant ambulance services. Results There were 10 independent clinical practice guidelines for the care of agitated patients in the 10 ambulance services. All services reported training in the management of agitated patients, and two services used a validated tool to assess the level of agitation. All services used physical restraint, although six services required police presence to restrain the patient. All ambulance services used some form of sedation, typically divided into the management of mild to moderate, and severe agitation. The most common agent for sedation was midazolam, while ketamine was the most common agent for sedating severely agitated patients. The maximum dose was varied, and contraindications for sedating agents varied between services. Conclusions There were wide variations across the ambulance services in terms of the assessment of agitation, as well as the use of physical restraint and sedation.",
keywords = "agitation, ambulance, emergency medical services, restraint, sedation, KETAMINE, SEDATION, MANAGEMENT, HALOPERIDOL, DELIRIUM, SCALE, COMA, PAIN",
author = "Dhanya Nambiar and Pearce, {James W.} and Janet Bray and Michael Stephenson and Ziad Nehme and Stacey Masters and Deon Brink and Karen Smith and Glenn Arendts and Daniel Fatovich and Stephen Bernard and Brian Haskins and Hugh Grantham and Peter Cameron",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1111/1742-6723.13431",
language = "English",
journal = "Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1742-6723",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",

}

Nambiar, D, Pearce, JW, Bray, J, Stephenson, M, Nehme, Z, Masters, S, Brink, D, Smith, K, Arendts, G, Fatovich, D, Bernard, S, Haskins, B, Grantham, H & Cameron, P 2019, 'Variations in the care of agitated patients in Australia and New Zealand ambulance services' Emergency Medicine Australasia. https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.13431

Variations in the care of agitated patients in Australia and New Zealand ambulance services. / Nambiar, Dhanya; Pearce, James W.; Bray, Janet; Stephenson, Michael; Nehme, Ziad; Masters, Stacey; Brink, Deon; Smith, Karen; Arendts, Glenn; Fatovich, Daniel; Bernard, Stephen; Haskins, Brian; Grantham, Hugh; Cameron, Peter.

In: Emergency Medicine Australasia, 15.12.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variations in the care of agitated patients in Australia and New Zealand ambulance services

AU - Nambiar, Dhanya

AU - Pearce, James W.

AU - Bray, Janet

AU - Stephenson, Michael

AU - Nehme, Ziad

AU - Masters, Stacey

AU - Brink, Deon

AU - Smith, Karen

AU - Arendts, Glenn

AU - Fatovich, Daniel

AU - Bernard, Stephen

AU - Haskins, Brian

AU - Grantham, Hugh

AU - Cameron, Peter

PY - 2019/12/15

Y1 - 2019/12/15

N2 - Objective The objective of the present study is to examine variations in paramedic care of the agitated patient, including verbal de-escalation, physical restraint and sedation, provided by ambulance services in Australia and New Zealand. Methods To examine the care of agitated patients, we first identified and reviewed all clinical practice guidelines for the management of agitated patients in Australian and New Zealand ambulance services between September and November 2018. We then conducted a structured questionnaire to obtain further information on the training, assessment and care of agitated patients by the ambulance services. Two authors extracted the data independently, and all interpretations and results were reviewed and confirmed by relevant ambulance services. Results There were 10 independent clinical practice guidelines for the care of agitated patients in the 10 ambulance services. All services reported training in the management of agitated patients, and two services used a validated tool to assess the level of agitation. All services used physical restraint, although six services required police presence to restrain the patient. All ambulance services used some form of sedation, typically divided into the management of mild to moderate, and severe agitation. The most common agent for sedation was midazolam, while ketamine was the most common agent for sedating severely agitated patients. The maximum dose was varied, and contraindications for sedating agents varied between services. Conclusions There were wide variations across the ambulance services in terms of the assessment of agitation, as well as the use of physical restraint and sedation.

AB - Objective The objective of the present study is to examine variations in paramedic care of the agitated patient, including verbal de-escalation, physical restraint and sedation, provided by ambulance services in Australia and New Zealand. Methods To examine the care of agitated patients, we first identified and reviewed all clinical practice guidelines for the management of agitated patients in Australian and New Zealand ambulance services between September and November 2018. We then conducted a structured questionnaire to obtain further information on the training, assessment and care of agitated patients by the ambulance services. Two authors extracted the data independently, and all interpretations and results were reviewed and confirmed by relevant ambulance services. Results There were 10 independent clinical practice guidelines for the care of agitated patients in the 10 ambulance services. All services reported training in the management of agitated patients, and two services used a validated tool to assess the level of agitation. All services used physical restraint, although six services required police presence to restrain the patient. All ambulance services used some form of sedation, typically divided into the management of mild to moderate, and severe agitation. The most common agent for sedation was midazolam, while ketamine was the most common agent for sedating severely agitated patients. The maximum dose was varied, and contraindications for sedating agents varied between services. Conclusions There were wide variations across the ambulance services in terms of the assessment of agitation, as well as the use of physical restraint and sedation.

KW - agitation

KW - ambulance

KW - emergency medical services

KW - restraint

KW - sedation

KW - KETAMINE

KW - SEDATION

KW - MANAGEMENT

KW - HALOPERIDOL

KW - DELIRIUM

KW - SCALE

KW - COMA

KW - PAIN

U2 - 10.1111/1742-6723.13431

DO - 10.1111/1742-6723.13431

M3 - Article

JO - Emergency Medicine

JF - Emergency Medicine

SN - 1742-6723

ER -