Abstract
Background: The primary objective was to validate and compare simulation based assessments with multiple choice question tests (MCQ) for assessment of competence of medical students and junior doctors in cardiac emergency management.
Methods: A prospective mixed methods approach was used. Participants completed both forms of assessment. Statistical and qualitative analyses were used to evaluate the psychometric properties of the assessments.
Results and Conclusions: The simulation assessment tools were shown to have similar psychometric properties to the MCQ test, but the simulation assessments had superior formative validity. Consideration could be given to employing simulation in addition to MCQ assessment.
Methods: A prospective mixed methods approach was used. Participants completed both forms of assessment. Statistical and qualitative analyses were used to evaluate the psychometric properties of the assessments.
Results and Conclusions: The simulation assessment tools were shown to have similar psychometric properties to the MCQ test, but the simulation assessments had superior formative validity. Consideration could be given to employing simulation in addition to MCQ assessment.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Qualification | Masters |
Awarding Institution |
|
Supervisors/Advisors |
|
Award date | 17 Nov 2016 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Unpublished - 2016 |