TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation of Population Pharmacokinetic Models for Clozapine Dosage Prediction
AU - Berneri, Massimo
AU - Jha, Uma
AU - O'Halloran, Seán
AU - Salman, Sam
AU - Wickramasinghe, Shanek
AU - Kendrick, Kevin
AU - Nguyen, Jessica
AU - Joyce, David A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/4
Y1 - 2024/4
N2 - Background:Clozapine is unique in its capacity to ameliorate severe schizophrenia but at high risk of toxicity. A relationship between blood concentration and clinical response and evidence for concentration-response relationships to some adverse effects justify therapeutic drug monitoring of clozapine. However, the relationship between drug dose and blood concentration is quite variable. This variability is, in part, due to inductive and inhibitory interactions varying the activity of cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2), the principal pathway for clozapine elimination. Several population pharmacokinetic models have been presented to facilitate dose selection and to identify poor adherence in individual patients. These models have faced little testing for validity in independent populations or even for persisting validity in the source population.Methods:Therefore, we collected a large population of clozapine-treated patients (127 patients, 1048 timed plasma concentrations) in whom dosing and covariate information could be obtained with high certainty. A population pharmacokinetic model was constructed with data collected in the first 6 weeks from study enrolment (448 plasma concentrations), to estimate covariate influences and to allow alignment with previously published models. The model was tested for its performance in predicting the concentrations observed at later time intervals up to 5 years. The predictive performances of 6 published clozapine population models were then assessed in the entire population.Results:The population pharmacokinetic model based on the first 6 weeks identified significant influences of sex, smoking, and cotreatment with fluvoxamine on clozapine clearance. The model built from the first 6 weeks had acceptable predictive performance in the same patient population up to the first 26 weeks using individual parameters, with a median predictive error (PE) of -0.1% to -15.9% and median absolute PE of 22.9%-27.1%. Predictive performance fell progressively with time after 26 weeks. Bayesian addition of plasma concentration observations within each prediction period improved individual predictions. Three additional observations extended acceptable predictive performance into the second 6 months of therapy. When the published models were tested with the entire data set, median PE ranged from -8% to +35% with a median absolute PE of >39% in all models. Thus, none of the tested models was successful in external validation. Bayesian addition of single patient observations improved individual predictions from all models but still without achieving acceptable performances.Conclusions:We conclude that the relationship between covariates and blood clozapine concentrations differs between populations and that relationships are not stable over time within a population. Current population models for clozapine are not capturing influential covariates.
AB - Background:Clozapine is unique in its capacity to ameliorate severe schizophrenia but at high risk of toxicity. A relationship between blood concentration and clinical response and evidence for concentration-response relationships to some adverse effects justify therapeutic drug monitoring of clozapine. However, the relationship between drug dose and blood concentration is quite variable. This variability is, in part, due to inductive and inhibitory interactions varying the activity of cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2), the principal pathway for clozapine elimination. Several population pharmacokinetic models have been presented to facilitate dose selection and to identify poor adherence in individual patients. These models have faced little testing for validity in independent populations or even for persisting validity in the source population.Methods:Therefore, we collected a large population of clozapine-treated patients (127 patients, 1048 timed plasma concentrations) in whom dosing and covariate information could be obtained with high certainty. A population pharmacokinetic model was constructed with data collected in the first 6 weeks from study enrolment (448 plasma concentrations), to estimate covariate influences and to allow alignment with previously published models. The model was tested for its performance in predicting the concentrations observed at later time intervals up to 5 years. The predictive performances of 6 published clozapine population models were then assessed in the entire population.Results:The population pharmacokinetic model based on the first 6 weeks identified significant influences of sex, smoking, and cotreatment with fluvoxamine on clozapine clearance. The model built from the first 6 weeks had acceptable predictive performance in the same patient population up to the first 26 weeks using individual parameters, with a median predictive error (PE) of -0.1% to -15.9% and median absolute PE of 22.9%-27.1%. Predictive performance fell progressively with time after 26 weeks. Bayesian addition of plasma concentration observations within each prediction period improved individual predictions. Three additional observations extended acceptable predictive performance into the second 6 months of therapy. When the published models were tested with the entire data set, median PE ranged from -8% to +35% with a median absolute PE of >39% in all models. Thus, none of the tested models was successful in external validation. Bayesian addition of single patient observations improved individual predictions from all models but still without achieving acceptable performances.Conclusions:We conclude that the relationship between covariates and blood clozapine concentrations differs between populations and that relationships are not stable over time within a population. Current population models for clozapine are not capturing influential covariates.
KW - clozapine
KW - dosage prediction
KW - independent model validation
KW - N -desmethylclozapine
KW - NONMEM
KW - population pharmacokinetics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85187963165&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/FTD.0000000000001184
DO - 10.1097/FTD.0000000000001184
M3 - Article
C2 - 38446630
AN - SCOPUS:85187963165
SN - 0163-4356
VL - 46
SP - 217
EP - 226
JO - Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
JF - Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
IS - 2
ER -