Validating the use of the Nidek MP-1 and CenterVue MAIA microperimeters

Evan Wong

doi:10.26182/6p93-0g78

Validating the use of the Nidek MP-1 and CenterVue MAIA microperimeters

Evan Wong

Research output: Thesis › Doctoral Thesis

70 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Microperimetry is a visual field test that can be performed in subjects with unstable or eccentric fixation. At the time of commencing my research, few studies had been conducted to investigate the validity of microperimetry. Therefore, I undertook a series of studies to assess the test-retest repeatability and the comparability of two commonly used microperimetry devices, the CenterVueMAIA, and the Nidek MP-1, in a range of conditions. A prospective, observational study was conducted between 2011 and 2013. Our results provided important data for deriving standards to meaningfully detect and measure progression in various cohorts when using the twomicroperimeters.

Original language	English
Qualification	Doctor of Philosophy
Awarding Institution	The University of Western Australia
Supervisors/Advisors	Chen, Fred, Supervisor Morgan, William, Supervisor
Thesis sponsors	Australian Government Research Training Program
Award date	14 Feb 2024
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.26182/6p93-0g78
Publication status	Unpublished - 2023

Access to Document

10.26182/6p93-0g78

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY - WONG Evan Norman Xi Ming - 2023_
This work is protected by Copyright. You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own non-commercial research or study. Any other use requires permission from the copyright owner. The Copyright Act requires you to attribute any copyright works you quote or paraphrase.

Cite this

@phdthesis{99f21a4898f543e99c20c63a7cf369e2,

title = "Validating the use of the Nidek MP-1 and CenterVue MAIA microperimeters",

abstract = "Microperimetry is a visual field test that can be performed in subjects with unstable or eccentric fixation. At the time of commencing my research, few studies had been conducted to investigate the validity of microperimetry. Therefore, I undertook a series of studies to assess the test-retest repeatability and the comparability of two commonly used microperimetry devices, the CenterVueMAIA, and the Nidek MP-1, in a range of conditions. A prospective, observational study was conducted between 2011 and 2013. Our results provided important data for deriving standards to meaningfully detect and measure progression in various cohorts when using the twomicroperimeters.",

keywords = "Microperimetry, Fundus-controlled perimetry, Perimetry, Visual field assessment, Visual function assessment, Nidek MP-1, CenterVue MAIA, Macula",

author = "Evan Wong",

year = "2023",

doi = "10.26182/6p93-0g78",

language = "English",

school = "The University of Western Australia",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - Validating the use of the Nidek MP-1 and CenterVue MAIA microperimeters

AU - Wong, Evan

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Microperimetry is a visual field test that can be performed in subjects with unstable or eccentric fixation. At the time of commencing my research, few studies had been conducted to investigate the validity of microperimetry. Therefore, I undertook a series of studies to assess the test-retest repeatability and the comparability of two commonly used microperimetry devices, the CenterVueMAIA, and the Nidek MP-1, in a range of conditions. A prospective, observational study was conducted between 2011 and 2013. Our results provided important data for deriving standards to meaningfully detect and measure progression in various cohorts when using the twomicroperimeters.

AB - Microperimetry is a visual field test that can be performed in subjects with unstable or eccentric fixation. At the time of commencing my research, few studies had been conducted to investigate the validity of microperimetry. Therefore, I undertook a series of studies to assess the test-retest repeatability and the comparability of two commonly used microperimetry devices, the CenterVueMAIA, and the Nidek MP-1, in a range of conditions. A prospective, observational study was conducted between 2011 and 2013. Our results provided important data for deriving standards to meaningfully detect and measure progression in various cohorts when using the twomicroperimeters.

KW - Microperimetry

KW - Fundus-controlled perimetry

KW - Perimetry

KW - Visual field assessment

KW - Visual function assessment

KW - Nidek MP-1

KW - CenterVue MAIA

KW - Macula

U2 - 10.26182/6p93-0g78

DO - 10.26182/6p93-0g78

M3 - Doctoral Thesis

ER -

Validating the use of the Nidek MP-1 and CenterVue MAIA microperimeters

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this