Abstract
Introduction
Patients suffering from malignant ascites usually require repeated large volume paracentesis (LVP) for symptomatic relief. This often requires hospital admission and has inherent risks.
Aim
To report the first Australian experience of placing tunneled indwelling peritoneal catheters (IPeC) for management of recurrent malignant ascites.
Methods
A retrospective study was conducted of tunneled IPeC use in patients with symptomatic malignant ascites in four hospitals in Western Australia (from 2010–2018). Procedure data, success rate and safety profile were collected from a database.
Results
Forty‐eight patients (median age, 65 years; female 56%) underwent 51 peritoneal catheter insertion procedures that were performed mostly by pleural specialists. The majority of patients (96%) had prior LVP (median 2 drainages, interquartile range (IQR) 1–4) before IPeC insertion. The IPeC was inserted successfully under ultrasound guidance in all patients. The median length of hospital stay for IPeC insertion and initial ascites drainage was 2 days (IQR 2–3 days) and most patients (96%) did not require further paracentesis after IPeC placement. The majority (96%) of patients experienced relief from ascites symptoms after catheter insertion. Most IPeC‐related adverse events were self‐limiting, including pain (in 25% cases), transient hypotension after initial fluid drainage (10%), peritoneal fluid leakage (10%), bacterial peritonitis (8%), fluid loculation (2%) and catheter dislodgement (2%). Six (12%) patients had IPeC removed. All patients with bacterial peritonitis responded to antibiotics and one required catheter removal.
Conclusions
Use of tunneled IPeC improves symptoms and can minimise further invasive drainage procedures in patients with symptomatic malignant ascites. Placement of IPeC was associated with a low rate of adverse events, most of which could be managed conservatively.
Patients suffering from malignant ascites usually require repeated large volume paracentesis (LVP) for symptomatic relief. This often requires hospital admission and has inherent risks.
Aim
To report the first Australian experience of placing tunneled indwelling peritoneal catheters (IPeC) for management of recurrent malignant ascites.
Methods
A retrospective study was conducted of tunneled IPeC use in patients with symptomatic malignant ascites in four hospitals in Western Australia (from 2010–2018). Procedure data, success rate and safety profile were collected from a database.
Results
Forty‐eight patients (median age, 65 years; female 56%) underwent 51 peritoneal catheter insertion procedures that were performed mostly by pleural specialists. The majority of patients (96%) had prior LVP (median 2 drainages, interquartile range (IQR) 1–4) before IPeC insertion. The IPeC was inserted successfully under ultrasound guidance in all patients. The median length of hospital stay for IPeC insertion and initial ascites drainage was 2 days (IQR 2–3 days) and most patients (96%) did not require further paracentesis after IPeC placement. The majority (96%) of patients experienced relief from ascites symptoms after catheter insertion. Most IPeC‐related adverse events were self‐limiting, including pain (in 25% cases), transient hypotension after initial fluid drainage (10%), peritoneal fluid leakage (10%), bacterial peritonitis (8%), fluid loculation (2%) and catheter dislodgement (2%). Six (12%) patients had IPeC removed. All patients with bacterial peritonitis responded to antibiotics and one required catheter removal.
Conclusions
Use of tunneled IPeC improves symptoms and can minimise further invasive drainage procedures in patients with symptomatic malignant ascites. Placement of IPeC was associated with a low rate of adverse events, most of which could be managed conservatively.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 705-711 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Internal Medicine Journal (Print) |
Volume | 50 |
Issue number | 6 |
Early online date | 2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2020 |