TY - JOUR
T1 - Urban land use does not limit weaver bird movements between wetlands in Cape Town, South Africa
AU - Calder, Jordan Laine
AU - Cumming, Graeme S.
AU - Maciejewski, Kristine
AU - Oschadleus, H. Dieter
N1 - Funding Information:
We are grateful to David Nkosi for his assistance in the field and to the many ringers who helped to ring weaver birds while assembling this data set. This research was funded by the DST/NRF Centre of Excellence at the Percy FitzPatrick Institute and a James S. McDonnell Foundation Grant to GSC. Funding was received by HDO from the African Bird Club Conservation Fund and the Cape Tercentenary Foundation for ringing on the Cape Peninsula in 2009–2010. Appendix A
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2015/7/1
Y1 - 2015/7/1
N2 - Urbanisation often has profound impacts on ecological processes. Management of these impacts is central to urban conservation efforts. We used data from 6591 individually ringed weaver birds from 42 ringing locations to investigate the influence that the urban matrix, as well as patch isolation, size and quality, had on weaver bird movement between ringing locations in Cape Town, a growing city within a global biodiversity hotspot. Distance-based linear models revealed that proximity to other sites was the dominant predictor of weaver movement while the site variables (wetland size and bird abundance) had a limited and inconclusive influence. Once the variation explained by the proximity and site variables had been accounted for, the composition of the surrounding urban matrix, the length of the least cost path between wetlands, and the presence of rivers as potential movement corridors (measured at three spatial scales) all had little influence on weaver movement. Analysis of the weaver bird movement-wetland network using social network analysis showed that the network is simple, clustered, and non-random, with relatively high vulnerability to node loss and some indication of preferential attachment (i.e., increased use of more used sites). Since proximity (site isolation) is the dominant influence on weaver movements, and the network is already sparse, further wetland loss is likely to reduce population viability. Our results match the predictions of classical theory and suggest that patch management will matter more for wetland passerines than matrix management.
AB - Urbanisation often has profound impacts on ecological processes. Management of these impacts is central to urban conservation efforts. We used data from 6591 individually ringed weaver birds from 42 ringing locations to investigate the influence that the urban matrix, as well as patch isolation, size and quality, had on weaver bird movement between ringing locations in Cape Town, a growing city within a global biodiversity hotspot. Distance-based linear models revealed that proximity to other sites was the dominant predictor of weaver movement while the site variables (wetland size and bird abundance) had a limited and inconclusive influence. Once the variation explained by the proximity and site variables had been accounted for, the composition of the surrounding urban matrix, the length of the least cost path between wetlands, and the presence of rivers as potential movement corridors (measured at three spatial scales) all had little influence on weaver movement. Analysis of the weaver bird movement-wetland network using social network analysis showed that the network is simple, clustered, and non-random, with relatively high vulnerability to node loss and some indication of preferential attachment (i.e., increased use of more used sites). Since proximity (site isolation) is the dominant influence on weaver movements, and the network is already sparse, further wetland loss is likely to reduce population viability. Our results match the predictions of classical theory and suggest that patch management will matter more for wetland passerines than matrix management.
KW - City
KW - Dispersal
KW - Fragmentation
KW - Fynbos
KW - Island biogeography
KW - Lake
KW - Matrix
KW - Passerine
KW - Ploceidae
KW - Proximity
KW - River
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929467462&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.04.021
DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.04.021
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84929467462
SN - 0006-3207
VL - 187
SP - 230
EP - 239
JO - Biological Conservation
JF - Biological Conservation
ER -