Unpacking team dynamics with growth modeling: An approach to test, refine, and integrate theory

Catherine G. Collins, Cristina B. Gibson, Narda R. Quigley, Sharon K. Parker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)
149 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this paper we advocate the use of growth modeling as an approach that is particularly useful for testing and refining existing theory on team dynamics, as well as integrating different theoretical perspectives. Quantitative studies that test team theories have typically included only one or two time points, between-team research designs, and hierarchical regression-based statistical analyses. Such an approach enables exploration of antecedents to explain why some teams are more effective than others at specified points in the team task or lifespan. In contrast, using three or more time points of data and applying growth modeling statistical analyses is atypical, but can allow for informative investigations of team trajectories, or patterns of change within teams. We argue that this approach can facilitate fruitful insights about team dynamics, and we provide guidelines for researchers as to how to investigate such team dynamics using growth modeling.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)63-91
Number of pages29
JournalOrganizational Psychology Review
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Feb 2016

Cite this

@article{9edf3502fdb045008bd37b26606c82de,
title = "Unpacking team dynamics with growth modeling: An approach to test, refine, and integrate theory",
abstract = "In this paper we advocate the use of growth modeling as an approach that is particularly useful for testing and refining existing theory on team dynamics, as well as integrating different theoretical perspectives. Quantitative studies that test team theories have typically included only one or two time points, between-team research designs, and hierarchical regression-based statistical analyses. Such an approach enables exploration of antecedents to explain why some teams are more effective than others at specified points in the team task or lifespan. In contrast, using three or more time points of data and applying growth modeling statistical analyses is atypical, but can allow for informative investigations of team trajectories, or patterns of change within teams. We argue that this approach can facilitate fruitful insights about team dynamics, and we provide guidelines for researchers as to how to investigate such team dynamics using growth modeling.",
keywords = "Growth mixture modeling, growth modeling, latent growth modeling, team change, team development, team dynamics, team trajectories, time, ORGANIZATIONAL-BEHAVIOR, WORK TEAMS, LONGITUDINAL-FIELD, PERFORMANCE, TIME, EFFICACY, TASK, PERSPECTIVE, LEADERSHIP, MULTILEVEL",
author = "Collins, {Catherine G.} and Gibson, {Cristina B.} and Quigley, {Narda R.} and Parker, {Sharon K.}",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1177/2041386614561249",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "63--91",
journal = "Organizational Psychology Review",
issn = "2041-3866",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

Unpacking team dynamics with growth modeling : An approach to test, refine, and integrate theory. / Collins, Catherine G.; Gibson, Cristina B.; Quigley, Narda R.; Parker, Sharon K.

In: Organizational Psychology Review, Vol. 6, No. 1, 05.02.2016, p. 63-91.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unpacking team dynamics with growth modeling

T2 - An approach to test, refine, and integrate theory

AU - Collins, Catherine G.

AU - Gibson, Cristina B.

AU - Quigley, Narda R.

AU - Parker, Sharon K.

PY - 2016/2/5

Y1 - 2016/2/5

N2 - In this paper we advocate the use of growth modeling as an approach that is particularly useful for testing and refining existing theory on team dynamics, as well as integrating different theoretical perspectives. Quantitative studies that test team theories have typically included only one or two time points, between-team research designs, and hierarchical regression-based statistical analyses. Such an approach enables exploration of antecedents to explain why some teams are more effective than others at specified points in the team task or lifespan. In contrast, using three or more time points of data and applying growth modeling statistical analyses is atypical, but can allow for informative investigations of team trajectories, or patterns of change within teams. We argue that this approach can facilitate fruitful insights about team dynamics, and we provide guidelines for researchers as to how to investigate such team dynamics using growth modeling.

AB - In this paper we advocate the use of growth modeling as an approach that is particularly useful for testing and refining existing theory on team dynamics, as well as integrating different theoretical perspectives. Quantitative studies that test team theories have typically included only one or two time points, between-team research designs, and hierarchical regression-based statistical analyses. Such an approach enables exploration of antecedents to explain why some teams are more effective than others at specified points in the team task or lifespan. In contrast, using three or more time points of data and applying growth modeling statistical analyses is atypical, but can allow for informative investigations of team trajectories, or patterns of change within teams. We argue that this approach can facilitate fruitful insights about team dynamics, and we provide guidelines for researchers as to how to investigate such team dynamics using growth modeling.

KW - Growth mixture modeling

KW - growth modeling

KW - latent growth modeling

KW - team change

KW - team development

KW - team dynamics

KW - team trajectories

KW - time

KW - ORGANIZATIONAL-BEHAVIOR

KW - WORK TEAMS

KW - LONGITUDINAL-FIELD

KW - PERFORMANCE

KW - TIME

KW - EFFICACY

KW - TASK

KW - PERSPECTIVE

KW - LEADERSHIP

KW - MULTILEVEL

UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84961254580&origin=inward&txGid=5B353C85B4722E6873C898D3B65875A6.wsnAw8kcdt7IPYLO0V48gA%3a1#

U2 - 10.1177/2041386614561249

DO - 10.1177/2041386614561249

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 63

EP - 91

JO - Organizational Psychology Review

JF - Organizational Psychology Review

SN - 2041-3866

IS - 1

ER -