United Kingdom Patent Decisions 2016

Julia Powles

doi:10.1007/s40319-017-0557-2

United Kingdom Patent Decisions 2016

Julia Powles

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

45 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This report highlights the main UK patent cases from 2016, including the interpretation of “plausibility” and “obvious to try”, obviousness, experimental use, numerical limits, infringement, stays, and a case to watch on “Arrow declarations”.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	179-183
Number of pages	5
Journal	IIC International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law
Volume	48
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-017-0557-2
Publication status	Published - 1 Mar 2017
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1007/s40319-017-0557-2Licence: CC BY

Powles 2017 United Kingdom Patent Decisions 2016Final published version, 318 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{62fc8e1106ac4a7a8737f051ff0bdfc2,

title = "United Kingdom Patent Decisions 2016",

abstract = "This report highlights the main UK patent cases from 2016, including the interpretation of “plausibility” and “obvious to try”, obviousness, experimental use, numerical limits, infringement, stays, and a case to watch on “Arrow declarations”.",

keywords = "Arrow declaration, experimental use, obvious to try, obviousness, patent law, plausibility",

author = "Julia Powles",

year = "2017",

month = mar,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/s40319-017-0557-2",

language = "English",

volume = "48",

pages = "179--183",

journal = "IIC International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law",

issn = "0018-9855",

publisher = "C.H. Beck Verlag",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - United Kingdom Patent Decisions 2016

AU - Powles, Julia

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - This report highlights the main UK patent cases from 2016, including the interpretation of “plausibility” and “obvious to try”, obviousness, experimental use, numerical limits, infringement, stays, and a case to watch on “Arrow declarations”.

AB - This report highlights the main UK patent cases from 2016, including the interpretation of “plausibility” and “obvious to try”, obviousness, experimental use, numerical limits, infringement, stays, and a case to watch on “Arrow declarations”.

KW - Arrow declaration

KW - experimental use

KW - obvious to try

KW - obviousness

KW - patent law

KW - plausibility

U2 - 10.1007/s40319-017-0557-2

DO - 10.1007/s40319-017-0557-2

M3 - Article

SN - 0018-9855

VL - 48

SP - 179

EP - 183

JO - IIC International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law

JF - IIC International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law

IS - 2

ER -

United Kingdom Patent Decisions 2016

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this