United Kingdom Patent Decisions 2016

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This report highlights the main UK patent cases from 2016, including the interpretation of “plausibility” and “obvious to try”, obviousness, experimental use, numerical limits, infringement, stays, and a case to watch on “Arrow declarations”.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)179-183
Number of pages5
JournalIIC International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law
Volume48
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Feb 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

patent
interpretation

Cite this

@article{62fc8e1106ac4a7a8737f051ff0bdfc2,
title = "United Kingdom Patent Decisions 2016",
abstract = "This report highlights the main UK patent cases from 2016, including the interpretation of “plausibility” and “obvious to try”, obviousness, experimental use, numerical limits, infringement, stays, and a case to watch on “Arrow declarations”.",
keywords = "Arrow declaration, experimental use, obvious to try, obviousness, patent law, plausibility",
author = "Julia Powles",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1007/s40319-017-0557-2",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "179--183",
journal = "IIC-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COMPETITION LAW",
issn = "0018-9855",
publisher = "C.H. Beck Verlag",
number = "2",

}

United Kingdom Patent Decisions 2016. / Powles, Julia.

In: IIC International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 48, No. 2, 28.02.2017, p. 179-183.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - United Kingdom Patent Decisions 2016

AU - Powles, Julia

PY - 2017/2/28

Y1 - 2017/2/28

N2 - This report highlights the main UK patent cases from 2016, including the interpretation of “plausibility” and “obvious to try”, obviousness, experimental use, numerical limits, infringement, stays, and a case to watch on “Arrow declarations”.

AB - This report highlights the main UK patent cases from 2016, including the interpretation of “plausibility” and “obvious to try”, obviousness, experimental use, numerical limits, infringement, stays, and a case to watch on “Arrow declarations”.

KW - Arrow declaration

KW - experimental use

KW - obvious to try

KW - obviousness

KW - patent law

KW - plausibility

U2 - 10.1007/s40319-017-0557-2

DO - 10.1007/s40319-017-0557-2

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 179

EP - 183

JO - IIC-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COMPETITION LAW

JF - IIC-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COMPETITION LAW

SN - 0018-9855

IS - 2

ER -