TY - JOUR
T1 - Understanding the impacts of mining on ecosystem services through a systematic review
AU - Boldy, Robyn
AU - Santini, Talitha
AU - Annandale, Mark
AU - Erskine, Peter D.
AU - Sonter, Laura J.
PY - 2021/3
Y1 - 2021/3
N2 - Mining activities can pose negative, sometimes irreversible damage to ecosystems, yet consequences for ecosystem services (ES) and their contribution to human wellbeing are more uncertain. Obtaining a clear understanding of where and how mining impacts ES and the methods used to show this is crucial for determining management approaches to overcome impacts. Here, we review the academic literature examining mining impacts to ES. We found only 60 papers assessed impacts to ES, with the majority focused on coal mining. Regulating services, such as carbon storage and erosion prevention, were most commonly assessed. We observed considerable variation in ES definitions and conceptualisations with no methodological consistency in ES assessments among studies. While we found negative impacts on ES were attributed to active mining operations and some positive impacts were related to restoration activities, our results also highlight major limitations to managing ES in mining regions. Assessing the full extent of impacts to ES from mining requires clear identification of changes in the ES chain – from biophysical supply to benefits and human wellbeing throughout the mining lifecycle. We propose a research agenda to address these knowledge gaps, which will help to improve pre- and post-mining ecosystem management for ES and human wellbeing.
AB - Mining activities can pose negative, sometimes irreversible damage to ecosystems, yet consequences for ecosystem services (ES) and their contribution to human wellbeing are more uncertain. Obtaining a clear understanding of where and how mining impacts ES and the methods used to show this is crucial for determining management approaches to overcome impacts. Here, we review the academic literature examining mining impacts to ES. We found only 60 papers assessed impacts to ES, with the majority focused on coal mining. Regulating services, such as carbon storage and erosion prevention, were most commonly assessed. We observed considerable variation in ES definitions and conceptualisations with no methodological consistency in ES assessments among studies. While we found negative impacts on ES were attributed to active mining operations and some positive impacts were related to restoration activities, our results also highlight major limitations to managing ES in mining regions. Assessing the full extent of impacts to ES from mining requires clear identification of changes in the ES chain – from biophysical supply to benefits and human wellbeing throughout the mining lifecycle. We propose a research agenda to address these knowledge gaps, which will help to improve pre- and post-mining ecosystem management for ES and human wellbeing.
KW - Ecoservices
KW - Ecosystem services
KW - Ecosystem-based management
KW - Mining
KW - Systematic literature review
KW - Wellbeing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100079500&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.exis.2020.12.005
DO - 10.1016/j.exis.2020.12.005
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85100079500
SN - 2214-790X
VL - 8
SP - 457
EP - 466
JO - Extractive Industries and Society
JF - Extractive Industries and Society
IS - 1
ER -