TY - JOUR
T1 - Understanding social-ecological interdependence using ecosystem services perspective in Bhutan, Eastern Himalayas:
AU - Kandel, Pratikshya
AU - Tshering, Dago
AU - Uddin, Kabir
AU - Lhamtshok, Tshering
AU - Aryal, Kamal
AU - Karki, Seema
AU - Sharma, Bikash
AU - Chettri, Nakul
PY - 2018/2
Y1 - 2018/2
N2 - Biophysical and economic values are often used to aid understanding of the complex interplay between ecosystems, their services, and human well-being, but community values are rarely considered. In a case study of Barshong gewog in Bhutan, we used mapping methods that involved (1) local knowledge and perceptions collected using participatory rural appraisal tools, (2) a household survey, and (3) geospatial inputs, to understand the linkages between human well-being and ecosystem services at the local level, as perceived by the community. The study identified three major ecosystems - forest, agriculture, and freshwater - that contribute highly to local livelihoods. Collectively, these ecosystems provide a wide range of goods and services, including 22 provisioning, 13 regulating, 4 supporting, and 6 cultural services. About 85% of the households depend directly upon provisioning ecosystem services for their livelihoods and income. The study also identified the importance of the ecosystems in terms of three value domains - ecological, socioeconomic, and cultural.
AB - Biophysical and economic values are often used to aid understanding of the complex interplay between ecosystems, their services, and human well-being, but community values are rarely considered. In a case study of Barshong gewog in Bhutan, we used mapping methods that involved (1) local knowledge and perceptions collected using participatory rural appraisal tools, (2) a household survey, and (3) geospatial inputs, to understand the linkages between human well-being and ecosystem services at the local level, as perceived by the community. The study identified three major ecosystems - forest, agriculture, and freshwater - that contribute highly to local livelihoods. Collectively, these ecosystems provide a wide range of goods and services, including 22 provisioning, 13 regulating, 4 supporting, and 6 cultural services. About 85% of the households depend directly upon provisioning ecosystem services for their livelihoods and income. The study also identified the importance of the ecosystems in terms of three value domains - ecological, socioeconomic, and cultural.
KW - community perceptions
KW - dependence
KW - ecosystem services
KW - land use
KW - participatory approaches
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043684631&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ecs2.2121
DO - 10.1002/ecs2.2121
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85043684631
SN - 2150-8925
VL - 9
JO - Ecosphere
JF - Ecosphere
IS - 2
M1 - e02121
ER -