UK’s Drip Law: Cynical, Misleading and an Affront to Democracy

Julia Powles

UK’s Drip Law: Cynical, Misleading and an Affront to Democracy

Research output: Contribution to specialist publication › Article in specialist publication

Abstract

Demonstrating the lack of knowledgeable leadership and the failure to engage in democratic debate, this 'data retention' surveillance law seeds distrust

Original language	English
Specialist publication	The Guardian
Publisher	The Guardian
Publication status	Published - 18 Jul 2014
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jul/18/uk-drip-ripa-law-sceptical-misleading-democracy-martha-lane-fox

Cite this

@misc{4bbb8fe58a5545e4ac94bbbc8f9ea38f,

title = "UK{\textquoteright}s Drip Law: Cynical, Misleading and an Affront to Democracy",

abstract = "Demonstrating the lack of knowledgeable leadership and the failure to engage in democratic debate, this 'data retention' surveillance law seeds distrust",

keywords = "Drip law",

author = "Julia Powles",

year = "2014",

month = jul,

day = "18",

language = "English",

journal = "The Guardian",

publisher = "The Guardian",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - UK’s Drip Law: Cynical, Misleading and an Affront to Democracy

AU - Powles, Julia

PY - 2014/7/18

Y1 - 2014/7/18

N2 - Demonstrating the lack of knowledgeable leadership and the failure to engage in democratic debate, this 'data retention' surveillance law seeds distrust

AB - Demonstrating the lack of knowledgeable leadership and the failure to engage in democratic debate, this 'data retention' surveillance law seeds distrust

KW - Drip law

M3 - Article in specialist publication

JO - The Guardian

JF - The Guardian

PB - The Guardian

ER -

UK’s Drip Law: Cynical, Misleading and an Affront to Democracy

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this