Two processes are not necessary to understand memory deficits

Adam F. Osth; John C. Dunn; Andrew Heathcote; Roger Ratcliff

doi:10.1017/S0140525X1900181X

Two processes are not necessary to understand memory deficits

Adam F. Osth, John C. Dunn, Andrew Heathcote, Roger Ratcliff

School of Psychological Science

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Bastin et al. propose a dual-process model to understand memory deficits. However, results from state-trace analysis have suggested a single underlying variable in behavioral and neural data. We advocate the usage of unidimensional models that are supported by data and have been successful in understanding memory deficits and in linking to neural data.

Original language	English
Article number	e294
Journal	Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume	42
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1900181X
Publication status	Published - 2019

Access to Document

10.1017/S0140525X1900181X

Cite this

@article{5721db795a8d47ed80383bff9aa1b623,

title = "Two processes are not necessary to understand memory deficits",

abstract = "Bastin et al. propose a dual-process model to understand memory deficits. However, results from state-trace analysis have suggested a single underlying variable in behavioral and neural data. We advocate the usage of unidimensional models that are supported by data and have been successful in understanding memory deficits and in linking to neural data.",

author = "Osth, {Adam F.} and Dunn, {John C.} and Andrew Heathcote and Roger Ratcliff",

year = "2019",

doi = "10.1017/S0140525X1900181X",

language = "English",

volume = "42",

journal = "Behavioral and Brain Sciences",

issn = "0140-525X",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Two processes are not necessary to understand memory deficits

AU - Osth, Adam F.

AU - Dunn, John C.

AU - Heathcote, Andrew

AU - Ratcliff, Roger

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Bastin et al. propose a dual-process model to understand memory deficits. However, results from state-trace analysis have suggested a single underlying variable in behavioral and neural data. We advocate the usage of unidimensional models that are supported by data and have been successful in understanding memory deficits and in linking to neural data.

AB - Bastin et al. propose a dual-process model to understand memory deficits. However, results from state-trace analysis have suggested a single underlying variable in behavioral and neural data. We advocate the usage of unidimensional models that are supported by data and have been successful in understanding memory deficits and in linking to neural data.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077438661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X1900181X

DO - 10.1017/S0140525X1900181X

M3 - Editorial

C2 - 31896353

AN - SCOPUS:85077438661

SN - 0140-525X

VL - 42

JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

M1 - e294

ER -

Two processes are not necessary to understand memory deficits

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this