Treatment patterns for cancer in Western Australia: does being Indigenous make a difference?

Sonj Hall, Caroline Bulsara, Mahesh Bulsara, T.G. Leahy, M.R. Culbong, Delia Hendrie, D'Arcy Holman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To examine whether hospital patients with cancer who were identified as Indigenous were as likely to receive surgery for the cancer as non-Indigenous patients.Design, setting and patients: Epidemiological survey of all Western Australian (WA) patients who had a cancer registration in the state-based WA Record Linkage Project that mentioned cancer of the breast (1982-2000) or cancer of the lung or prostate (1982-2001).Main outcome measures: The likelihoods of receiving breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy for breast cancer, lung surgery for lung cancer, or radical or non-radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer were compared between the Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations using adjusted logistic regression analyses.Results: Indigenous people were less likely to receive surgery for their lung cancer (odds ratio [OR], 0.64; 95% CI, 0.41-0.98). Indigenous men were as likely as non-Indigenous men to receive non-radical prostatectomy (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.40-1.17); only one Indigenous man out of 64 received radical prostatectomy. Indigenous women were as likely as non-Indigenous women to undergo breast-conserving surgery (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.60-1.21).Conclusions: These results indicate a different pattern of surgical care for Indigenous patients in relation to lung and prostate, but not breast, cancer. Reasons for these disparities, such as treatment choice and barriers to care, require further investigation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)191-194
JournalMedical Journal of Australia
Volume181
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Treatment patterns for cancer in Western Australia: does being Indigenous make a difference?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this