Transnational families, care and wellbeing

Loretta Baldassar, Majella Kilkey, Laura Merla, Raelene Wilding

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference paperChapter

Abstract

The notion of ‘transnational families’ emerged at the beginning of the twenty-first century to designate in particular ‘families that live some or most of the time separated from each other, yet hold together and create something that can be seen as a feeling of collective welfare and unity, namely “familyhood”, even across national borders’ (Bryceson and Vuorela, 2002: 18). Because of geographical distance, the maintenance of collective welfare and unity in transnational families largely relies on the ability of transnational family members to participate in the circulation of care across distance and national borders, an ability that represents a key feature of migrant wellbeing. The concept of care is indeed strongly related to issues surrounding welfare and wellbeing, both at an individual and collective level. As Daly (2011) points out, care relates not only to the servicing of the needs of those who cannot take care of themselves as well as those who are able-bodied, it also emphasises in a broader sense the relational foundations of all social life. In other words, ‘key elements of people's welfare inhere in their relations with others and the reciprocity around responses to need and the receipt of recognition and value for who people are’ (Daly, 2011: 47–48). In this chapter, we define the circulation of care in transnational families as a ‘capability’ (Sen, 1987), and discuss how the ability to participate in care exchanges impacts on the wellbeing of transnational family members – in terms of the provision of their care needs, of reciprocal care obligations and practices, and of identity recognition. This also leads us to examine the ways in which new communication technologies transform the ways in which caring relationships are experienced and practiced, and to highlight how policy mediates families’ capabilities to care across distance.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHandbook of Migration and Health
EditorsFelicity Thomas
Place of PublicationCheltenham, UK
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing
Pages477–497
ISBN (Print)9781784714772
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

welfare
national border
family member
ability
family policy
reciprocity
twenty-first century
new technology
obligation
communication technology
migrant
Values

Cite this

Baldassar, L., Kilkey, M., Merla, L., & Wilding, R. (2016). Transnational families, care and wellbeing. In F. T. (Ed.), Handbook of Migration and Health (pp. 477–497). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784714789.00039
Baldassar, Loretta ; Kilkey, Majella ; Merla, Laura ; Wilding, Raelene. / Transnational families, care and wellbeing. Handbook of Migration and Health. editor / Felicity Thomas. Cheltenham, UK : Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016. pp. 477–497
@inbook{c9acb2a5466741cda85717602a949683,
title = "Transnational families, care and wellbeing",
abstract = "The notion of ‘transnational families’ emerged at the beginning of the twenty-first century to designate in particular ‘families that live some or most of the time separated from each other, yet hold together and create something that can be seen as a feeling of collective welfare and unity, namely “familyhood”, even across national borders’ (Bryceson and Vuorela, 2002: 18). Because of geographical distance, the maintenance of collective welfare and unity in transnational families largely relies on the ability of transnational family members to participate in the circulation of care across distance and national borders, an ability that represents a key feature of migrant wellbeing. The concept of care is indeed strongly related to issues surrounding welfare and wellbeing, both at an individual and collective level. As Daly (2011) points out, care relates not only to the servicing of the needs of those who cannot take care of themselves as well as those who are able-bodied, it also emphasises in a broader sense the relational foundations of all social life. In other words, ‘key elements of people's welfare inhere in their relations with others and the reciprocity around responses to need and the receipt of recognition and value for who people are’ (Daly, 2011: 47–48). In this chapter, we define the circulation of care in transnational families as a ‘capability’ (Sen, 1987), and discuss how the ability to participate in care exchanges impacts on the wellbeing of transnational family members – in terms of the provision of their care needs, of reciprocal care obligations and practices, and of identity recognition. This also leads us to examine the ways in which new communication technologies transform the ways in which caring relationships are experienced and practiced, and to highlight how policy mediates families’ capabilities to care across distance.",
author = "Loretta Baldassar and Majella Kilkey and Laura Merla and Raelene Wilding",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.4337/9781784714789.00039",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781784714772",
pages = "477–497",
editor = "{Felicity Thomas}",
booktitle = "Handbook of Migration and Health",
publisher = "Edward Elgar Publishing",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Baldassar, L, Kilkey, M, Merla, L & Wilding, R 2016, Transnational families, care and wellbeing. in FT (ed.), Handbook of Migration and Health. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK, pp. 477–497. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784714789.00039

Transnational families, care and wellbeing. / Baldassar, Loretta; Kilkey, Majella; Merla, Laura; Wilding, Raelene.

Handbook of Migration and Health. ed. / Felicity Thomas. Cheltenham, UK : Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016. p. 477–497.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference paperChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Transnational families, care and wellbeing

AU - Baldassar, Loretta

AU - Kilkey, Majella

AU - Merla, Laura

AU - Wilding, Raelene

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The notion of ‘transnational families’ emerged at the beginning of the twenty-first century to designate in particular ‘families that live some or most of the time separated from each other, yet hold together and create something that can be seen as a feeling of collective welfare and unity, namely “familyhood”, even across national borders’ (Bryceson and Vuorela, 2002: 18). Because of geographical distance, the maintenance of collective welfare and unity in transnational families largely relies on the ability of transnational family members to participate in the circulation of care across distance and national borders, an ability that represents a key feature of migrant wellbeing. The concept of care is indeed strongly related to issues surrounding welfare and wellbeing, both at an individual and collective level. As Daly (2011) points out, care relates not only to the servicing of the needs of those who cannot take care of themselves as well as those who are able-bodied, it also emphasises in a broader sense the relational foundations of all social life. In other words, ‘key elements of people's welfare inhere in their relations with others and the reciprocity around responses to need and the receipt of recognition and value for who people are’ (Daly, 2011: 47–48). In this chapter, we define the circulation of care in transnational families as a ‘capability’ (Sen, 1987), and discuss how the ability to participate in care exchanges impacts on the wellbeing of transnational family members – in terms of the provision of their care needs, of reciprocal care obligations and practices, and of identity recognition. This also leads us to examine the ways in which new communication technologies transform the ways in which caring relationships are experienced and practiced, and to highlight how policy mediates families’ capabilities to care across distance.

AB - The notion of ‘transnational families’ emerged at the beginning of the twenty-first century to designate in particular ‘families that live some or most of the time separated from each other, yet hold together and create something that can be seen as a feeling of collective welfare and unity, namely “familyhood”, even across national borders’ (Bryceson and Vuorela, 2002: 18). Because of geographical distance, the maintenance of collective welfare and unity in transnational families largely relies on the ability of transnational family members to participate in the circulation of care across distance and national borders, an ability that represents a key feature of migrant wellbeing. The concept of care is indeed strongly related to issues surrounding welfare and wellbeing, both at an individual and collective level. As Daly (2011) points out, care relates not only to the servicing of the needs of those who cannot take care of themselves as well as those who are able-bodied, it also emphasises in a broader sense the relational foundations of all social life. In other words, ‘key elements of people's welfare inhere in their relations with others and the reciprocity around responses to need and the receipt of recognition and value for who people are’ (Daly, 2011: 47–48). In this chapter, we define the circulation of care in transnational families as a ‘capability’ (Sen, 1987), and discuss how the ability to participate in care exchanges impacts on the wellbeing of transnational family members – in terms of the provision of their care needs, of reciprocal care obligations and practices, and of identity recognition. This also leads us to examine the ways in which new communication technologies transform the ways in which caring relationships are experienced and practiced, and to highlight how policy mediates families’ capabilities to care across distance.

U2 - 10.4337/9781784714789.00039

DO - 10.4337/9781784714789.00039

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781784714772

SP - 477

EP - 497

BT - Handbook of Migration and Health

A2 - null, Felicity Thomas

PB - Edward Elgar Publishing

CY - Cheltenham, UK

ER -

Baldassar L, Kilkey M, Merla L, Wilding R. Transnational families, care and wellbeing. In FT, editor, Handbook of Migration and Health. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. 2016. p. 477–497 https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784714789.00039