Transformational leadership development: Connecting psychological and behavioral change

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to investigate whether leaders whose transformational leadership behavior improves after training exhibit different psychological reactions compared to leaders whose leadership behavior does not improve. Design/methodology/approach: The authors followed 56 leaders taking part in a transformational leadership training program. Questionnaire measures of leaders' self-efficacy, positive affect, perspective taking, and transformational leadership behavior were obtained pre- and post-training. Findings: Leaders whose self-efficacy, perspective taking and positive affect increased over the training period also reported improvements in their transformational leadership behavior. In addition, leaders whose positive affect increased were more likely to receive improved transformational leadership behavior ratings from their supervisors, team members and peers. Research limitations/implications: The study supports the proposition, derived from social cognitive theory that change in transformational leadership behavior is related to change in leaders' psychological attributes. Further research is required to establish the direction of this relationship and whether leaders' psychological reactions represent a means through which the effectiveness of leadership interventions can be improved. Practical implications: Leaders' psychological reactions should be monitored and supported during developmental interventions. Effective leadership training interventions are important not only to achieve change in behavior, but to avoid negative psychological outcomes for leaders. Originality/value: The study is unusual because it explores the relationship between leader attributes and leadership behavior longitudinally, in a training context. The longitudinal analysis, focussing on change in leaders' psychological attributes, allowed us to explain more variance in leaders' reactions to training. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)174-194
JournalLeadership and Organization Development Journal
Volume35
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Transformational leadership
Psychological
Behavioural change
Leadership development
Leadership behavior
Positive affect
Self-efficacy
Perspective taking
Effective leadership
Longitudinal analysis
Peers
Social cognitive theory
Training program
Questionnaire
Supervisors
Rating
Design methodology

Cite this

@article{f3826b33982340d0b5e23448a5df7560,
title = "Transformational leadership development: Connecting psychological and behavioral change",
abstract = "Purpose: This paper aims to investigate whether leaders whose transformational leadership behavior improves after training exhibit different psychological reactions compared to leaders whose leadership behavior does not improve. Design/methodology/approach: The authors followed 56 leaders taking part in a transformational leadership training program. Questionnaire measures of leaders' self-efficacy, positive affect, perspective taking, and transformational leadership behavior were obtained pre- and post-training. Findings: Leaders whose self-efficacy, perspective taking and positive affect increased over the training period also reported improvements in their transformational leadership behavior. In addition, leaders whose positive affect increased were more likely to receive improved transformational leadership behavior ratings from their supervisors, team members and peers. Research limitations/implications: The study supports the proposition, derived from social cognitive theory that change in transformational leadership behavior is related to change in leaders' psychological attributes. Further research is required to establish the direction of this relationship and whether leaders' psychological reactions represent a means through which the effectiveness of leadership interventions can be improved. Practical implications: Leaders' psychological reactions should be monitored and supported during developmental interventions. Effective leadership training interventions are important not only to achieve change in behavior, but to avoid negative psychological outcomes for leaders. Originality/value: The study is unusual because it explores the relationship between leader attributes and leadership behavior longitudinally, in a training context. The longitudinal analysis, focussing on change in leaders' psychological attributes, allowed us to explain more variance in leaders' reactions to training. {\circledC} Emerald Group Publishing Limited.",
author = "C.M. Mason and Mark Griffin and Sharon Parker",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1108/LODJ-05-2012-0063",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "174--194",
journal = "Leadership & Organization Development Journal",
issn = "0143-7739",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Limited",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transformational leadership development: Connecting psychological and behavioral change

AU - Mason, C.M.

AU - Griffin, Mark

AU - Parker, Sharon

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Purpose: This paper aims to investigate whether leaders whose transformational leadership behavior improves after training exhibit different psychological reactions compared to leaders whose leadership behavior does not improve. Design/methodology/approach: The authors followed 56 leaders taking part in a transformational leadership training program. Questionnaire measures of leaders' self-efficacy, positive affect, perspective taking, and transformational leadership behavior were obtained pre- and post-training. Findings: Leaders whose self-efficacy, perspective taking and positive affect increased over the training period also reported improvements in their transformational leadership behavior. In addition, leaders whose positive affect increased were more likely to receive improved transformational leadership behavior ratings from their supervisors, team members and peers. Research limitations/implications: The study supports the proposition, derived from social cognitive theory that change in transformational leadership behavior is related to change in leaders' psychological attributes. Further research is required to establish the direction of this relationship and whether leaders' psychological reactions represent a means through which the effectiveness of leadership interventions can be improved. Practical implications: Leaders' psychological reactions should be monitored and supported during developmental interventions. Effective leadership training interventions are important not only to achieve change in behavior, but to avoid negative psychological outcomes for leaders. Originality/value: The study is unusual because it explores the relationship between leader attributes and leadership behavior longitudinally, in a training context. The longitudinal analysis, focussing on change in leaders' psychological attributes, allowed us to explain more variance in leaders' reactions to training. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

AB - Purpose: This paper aims to investigate whether leaders whose transformational leadership behavior improves after training exhibit different psychological reactions compared to leaders whose leadership behavior does not improve. Design/methodology/approach: The authors followed 56 leaders taking part in a transformational leadership training program. Questionnaire measures of leaders' self-efficacy, positive affect, perspective taking, and transformational leadership behavior were obtained pre- and post-training. Findings: Leaders whose self-efficacy, perspective taking and positive affect increased over the training period also reported improvements in their transformational leadership behavior. In addition, leaders whose positive affect increased were more likely to receive improved transformational leadership behavior ratings from their supervisors, team members and peers. Research limitations/implications: The study supports the proposition, derived from social cognitive theory that change in transformational leadership behavior is related to change in leaders' psychological attributes. Further research is required to establish the direction of this relationship and whether leaders' psychological reactions represent a means through which the effectiveness of leadership interventions can be improved. Practical implications: Leaders' psychological reactions should be monitored and supported during developmental interventions. Effective leadership training interventions are important not only to achieve change in behavior, but to avoid negative psychological outcomes for leaders. Originality/value: The study is unusual because it explores the relationship between leader attributes and leadership behavior longitudinally, in a training context. The longitudinal analysis, focussing on change in leaders' psychological attributes, allowed us to explain more variance in leaders' reactions to training. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

U2 - 10.1108/LODJ-05-2012-0063

DO - 10.1108/LODJ-05-2012-0063

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 174

EP - 194

JO - Leadership & Organization Development Journal

JF - Leadership & Organization Development Journal

SN - 0143-7739

IS - 3

ER -