Training surface and intensity : inflammation, hemolysis and hepcidin expression

Peter Peeling, Brian Dawson, C. Goodman, Grant Landers, E.T. Wiegerinck, D.W. Swinkels, Debbie Trinder

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    83 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Purpose: This investigation assessed the effects of training intensity and ground surface type on hemolysis, inflammation, and hepcidin activity during running. Methods: Ten highly trained male endurance athletes completed a graded exercise test, two continuous 10-km runs on a grass (GRASS) and a bitumen road surface (ROAD) at 75%-80% peak V·O2 running velocity, and a 10 × 1-km interval running session (INT) at 90%-95% of the peak V·O2 running velocity. Venous blood and urine samples were collected before, immediately after, and at 3 and 24 h after exercise. Serum samples were analyzed for circulating levels of IL-6, free hemoglobin (Hb), haptoglobin (Hp), iron, and ferritin. Urine samples were analyzed for changes in hepcidin expression. Results: After running, the IL-6 and free Hb were significantly greater, and serum Hp was significantly lower than preexercise values in all three conditions (P <0.05). Furthermore, IL-6 levels and the change in free Hb from baseline were significantly greater in the INT compared with those in the GRASS (P <0.05). There were no differences between the GRASS and ROAD training surfaces (P > 0.05). Serum iron and ferritin were significantly increased after exercise in all three conditions (P <0.05) but were not different between trials. Conclusion: Greater running intensities incur more inflammation and hemolysis, but these variables were not affected by the surface type trained upon.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1138-1145
    JournalMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
    Volume41
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Training surface and intensity : inflammation, hemolysis and hepcidin expression'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this