TY - JOUR
T1 - Trade in live reptiles, its impact on wild populations, and the role of the European market
AU - Auliya, Mark
AU - Altherr, Sandra
AU - Ariano-Sanchez, Daniel
AU - Baard, Ernst H.
AU - Brown, Carl
AU - Brown, Rafe M.
AU - Cantu, Juan-Carlos
AU - Gentile, Gabriele
AU - Gildenhuys, Paul
AU - Henningheim, Evert
AU - Hintzmann, Juergen
AU - Kanari, Kahoru
AU - Krvavac, Milivoje
AU - Lettink, Marieke
AU - Lippert, Joerg
AU - Luiselli, Luca
AU - Nilson, Goran
AU - Truong Quang Nguyen, null
AU - Nijman, Vincent
AU - Parham, James F.
AU - Pasachnik, Stesha A.
AU - Pedrono, Miguel
AU - Rauhaus, Anna
AU - Cordova, Danny Rueda
AU - Sanchez, Maria-Elena
AU - Schepp, Ulrich
AU - van Schingen, Mona
AU - Schneeweiss, Norbert
AU - Segniagbeto, Gabriel H.
AU - Somaweera, Ruchira
AU - Sy, Emerson Y.
AU - Turkozan, Oguz
AU - Vinke, Sabine
AU - Vinke, Thomas
AU - Vyas, Raju
AU - Williamson, Stuart
AU - Ziegler, Thomas
PY - 2016/12/1
Y1 - 2016/12/1
N2 - Of the 10,272 currently recognized reptile species, the trade of fewer than 8% are regulated by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) and the European Wildlife Trade Regulations (EWTR). However, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List has assessed 45% of the world's reptile species and determined that at least 1390 species are threatened by "biological resource use". Of these, 355 species are intentionally targeted by collectors, including 194 non-CITES-listed species. Herein we review the global reptile pet trade, its impacts, and its contribution to the over-harvesting of species and populations, in light of current international law. Findings are based on an examination of relevant professional observations, online sources, and literature (e.g., applicable policies, taxonomy [reptile database], trade statistics [EUROSTAT], and conservation status [IUCN Red List]). Case studies are presented from the following countries and regions: Australia, Central America, China, Galapagos Islands (Ecuador), Germany, Europe, India, Indonesia (Kalimantan), Islamic Republic of Iran, Japan, Madagascar, Mexico, New Zealand, the Philippines, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Vietnam, Western Africa, and Western Asia. The European Union (EU) plays a major role in reptile trade. Between 2004 and 2014 (the period under study), the EU member states officially reported the import of 20,788,747 live reptiles. This review suggests that illegal trade activities involve species regulated under CITES, as well as species that are not CITES-regulated but nationally protected in their country of origin and often openly offered for sale in the EU. Further, these case studies demonstrate that regulations and enforcement in several countries are inadequate to prevent the overexploitation of species and to halt illegal trade activities. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
AB - Of the 10,272 currently recognized reptile species, the trade of fewer than 8% are regulated by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) and the European Wildlife Trade Regulations (EWTR). However, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List has assessed 45% of the world's reptile species and determined that at least 1390 species are threatened by "biological resource use". Of these, 355 species are intentionally targeted by collectors, including 194 non-CITES-listed species. Herein we review the global reptile pet trade, its impacts, and its contribution to the over-harvesting of species and populations, in light of current international law. Findings are based on an examination of relevant professional observations, online sources, and literature (e.g., applicable policies, taxonomy [reptile database], trade statistics [EUROSTAT], and conservation status [IUCN Red List]). Case studies are presented from the following countries and regions: Australia, Central America, China, Galapagos Islands (Ecuador), Germany, Europe, India, Indonesia (Kalimantan), Islamic Republic of Iran, Japan, Madagascar, Mexico, New Zealand, the Philippines, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Vietnam, Western Africa, and Western Asia. The European Union (EU) plays a major role in reptile trade. Between 2004 and 2014 (the period under study), the EU member states officially reported the import of 20,788,747 live reptiles. This review suggests that illegal trade activities involve species regulated under CITES, as well as species that are not CITES-regulated but nationally protected in their country of origin and often openly offered for sale in the EU. Further, these case studies demonstrate that regulations and enforcement in several countries are inadequate to prevent the overexploitation of species and to halt illegal trade activities. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
KW - European Union
KW - Illegal
KW - International law
KW - Over-exploitation
KW - Pet trade
KW - Reptile diversity
KW - INTERNATIONAL-TRADE
KW - CONSERVATION STATUS
KW - TAXONOMIC REVISION
KW - GLOBAL TRADE
KW - SIEBENROCKIELLA-LEYTENSIS
KW - GONIUROSAURUS SQUAMATA
KW - BIODIVERSITY HOTSPOTS
KW - ILLEGAL TRADE
KW - 1ST RECORD
KW - SRI-LANKA
U2 - 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.017
DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.017
M3 - Review article
SN - 0006-3207
VL - 204
SP - 103
EP - 119
JO - Biological Conservation
JF - Biological Conservation
IS - Part A
ER -