Towards the Development of an Integrative, Evidence-Based Suite of Indicators for the Prediction of Outcome Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Results from a Pilot Study

Aleksandra Gozt, Melissa Licari, Alison Halstrom, Hannah Milbourn, Stephen Lydiard, Anna Black, Glenn Arendts, Stephen Macdonald, Swithin Song, Ellen MacDonald, Philip Vlaskovsky, Sally Burrows, Michael Bynevelt, Carmela Pestell, Daniel Fatovich, Melinda Fitzgerald

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Persisting post-concussion symptoms (PPCS) is a complex, multifaceted condition in which individuals continue to experience the symptoms of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI; concussion) beyond the timeframe that it typically takes to recover. Currently, there is no way of knowing which individuals may develop this condition.

METHOD: Patients presenting to a hospital emergency department (ED) within 48 h of sustaining a mTBI underwent neuropsychological assessment and demographic, injury-related information and blood samples were collected. Concentrations of blood-based biomarkers neuron specific enolase, neurofilament protein-light, and glial fibrillary acidic protein were assessed, and a subset of patients also underwent diffusion tensor-magnetic resonance imaging; both relative to healthy controls. Individuals were classified as having PPCS if they reported a score of 25 or higher on the Rivermead Postconcussion Symptoms Questionnaire at ~28 days post-injury. Univariate exact logistic regression was performed to identify measures that may be predictive of PPCS. Neuroimaging data were examined for differences in fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity in regions of interest.

RESULTS: Of n = 36 individuals, three (8.33%) were classified as having PPCS. Increased performance on the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Update Total Score (OR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.61-0.95, p = 0.004), Immediate Memory (OR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.56-0.94, p = 0.001), and Attention (OR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.71-0.97, p = 0.007) indices, as well as faster completion of the Trails Making Test B (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.00-1.12, p = 0.032) at ED presentation were associated with a statistically significant decreased odds of an individual being classified as having PPCS. There was no significant association between blood-based biomarkers and PPCS in this small sample, although glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) was significantly increased in individuals with mTBI relative to healthy controls. Furthermore, relative to healthy age and sex-matched controls (n = 8), individuals with mTBI (n = 14) had higher levels of FA within the left inferior frontal occipital fasciculus (t (18.06) = -3.01, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION: Performance on neuropsychological measures may be useful for predicting PPCS, but further investigation is required to elucidate the utility of this and other potential predictors.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBrain Sciences
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2020

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Towards the Development of an Integrative, Evidence-Based Suite of Indicators for the Prediction of Outcome Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Results from a Pilot Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this