Towards a consensus on a hearing preservation classification system

H. Skarz̈yński; P.H. Van De Heyning; S. Agrawal; S.L. Arauz; Marcus Atlas; W.D. Baumgartner; M.D. Caversaccio; M.S. De Bodt; J. Gavilan; B. Godey; K. Green; W.K. Gstöettner; R. Hagen; D. Han; M. Kameswaran; E. Karltorp; M. Kompis; V.E. Kuzovkov; L. Lassaletta; F. Levevre; Y. Li; M. Manikoth; J.G. Martin; R. Mlynski; J. Mueller; M.P. O'Driscoll; L.S. Parnes; S. Prentiss; S. Pulibalathingal; C.H. Raine; Gunesh Rajan; R. Rajeswaran; J.A. Rivas; A. Rivas; P.H. Skarzyński; G.M. Sprinzl; H. Staecker; K. Stephan; S.I. Usami; Y. Yanov; M.E. Zernotti; K. Zimmermann; A. Lorens; G. Mertens

doi:10.3109/00016489.2013.869059

Towards a consensus on a hearing preservation classification system

H. Skarz̈yński, P.H. Van De Heyning, S. Agrawal, S.L. Arauz, Marcus Atlas, W.D. Baumgartner, M.D. Caversaccio, M.S. De Bodt, J. Gavilan, B. Godey, K. Green, W.K. Gstöettner, R. Hagen, D. Han, M. Kameswaran, E. Karltorp, M. Kompis, V.E. Kuzovkov, L. Lassaletta, F. LevevreY. Li, M. Manikoth, J.G. Martin, R. Mlynski, J. Mueller, M.P. O'Driscoll, L.S. Parnes, S. Prentiss, S. Pulibalathingal, C.H. Raine, Gunesh Rajan, R. Rajeswaran, J.A. Rivas, A. Rivas, P.H. Skarzyński, G.M. Sprinzl, H. Staecker, K. Stephan, S.I. Usami, Y. Yanov, M.E. Zernotti, K. Zimmermann, A. Lorens, G. Mertens

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

146 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Conclusion: The comprehensive Hearing Preservation classification system presented in this paper is suitable for use for all cochlear implant users with measurable pre-operative residual hearing. If adopted as a universal reporting standard, as it was designed to be, it should prove highly beneficial by enabling future studies to quickly and easily compare the results of previous studies and meta-analyze their data. Objectives: To develop a comprehensive Hearing Preservation classification system suitable for use for all cochlear implant users with measurable pre-operative residual hearing. Methods: The HEARRING group discussed and reviewed a number of different propositions of a HP classification systems and reviewed critical appraisals to develop a qualitative system in accordance with the prerequisites. Results: The Hearing Preservation Classification System proposed herein fulfills the following necessary criteria: 1) classification is independent from users' initial hearing, 2) it is appropriate for all cochlear implant users with measurable pre-operative residual hearing, 3) it covers the whole range of pure tone average from 0 to 120 dB; 4) it is easy to use and easy to understand. © 2013 Informa Healthcare.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	3-13
Journal	Acta Oto-Laryngologica
Volume	133
Issue number	S564
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489.2013.869059
Publication status	Published - 2013

Access to Document

10.3109/00016489.2013.869059

Cite this

Skarz̈yński, H., Van De Heyning, P. H., Agrawal, S., Arauz, S. L., Atlas, M., Baumgartner, W. D., Caversaccio, M. D., De Bodt, M. S., Gavilan, J., Godey, B., Green, K., Gstöettner, W. K., Hagen, R., Han, D., Kameswaran, M., Karltorp, E., Kompis, M., Kuzovkov, V. E., Lassaletta, L., ... Mertens, G. (2013). Towards a consensus on a hearing preservation classification system. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 133(S564), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489.2013.869059

@article{90fdfd4164f8435fa000fb633c7e4e12,

title = "Towards a consensus on a hearing preservation classification system",

abstract = "Conclusion: The comprehensive Hearing Preservation classification system presented in this paper is suitable for use for all cochlear implant users with measurable pre-operative residual hearing. If adopted as a universal reporting standard, as it was designed to be, it should prove highly beneficial by enabling future studies to quickly and easily compare the results of previous studies and meta-analyze their data. Objectives: To develop a comprehensive Hearing Preservation classification system suitable for use for all cochlear implant users with measurable pre-operative residual hearing. Methods: The HEARRING group discussed and reviewed a number of different propositions of a HP classification systems and reviewed critical appraisals to develop a qualitative system in accordance with the prerequisites. Results: The Hearing Preservation Classification System proposed herein fulfills the following necessary criteria: 1) classification is independent from users' initial hearing, 2) it is appropriate for all cochlear implant users with measurable pre-operative residual hearing, 3) it covers the whole range of pure tone average from 0 to 120 dB; 4) it is easy to use and easy to understand. {\textcopyright} 2013 Informa Healthcare.",

author = "H. Skar{\"z}y{\'n}ski and {Van De Heyning}, P.H. and S. Agrawal and S.L. Arauz and Marcus Atlas and W.D. Baumgartner and M.D. Caversaccio and {De Bodt}, M.S. and J. Gavilan and B. Godey and K. Green and W.K. Gst{\"o}ettner and R. Hagen and D. Han and M. Kameswaran and E. Karltorp and M. Kompis and V.E. Kuzovkov and L. Lassaletta and F. Levevre and Y. Li and M. Manikoth and J.G. Martin and R. Mlynski and J. Mueller and M.P. O'Driscoll and L.S. Parnes and S. Prentiss and S. Pulibalathingal and C.H. Raine and Gunesh Rajan and R. Rajeswaran and J.A. Rivas and A. Rivas and P.H. Skarzy{\'n}ski and G.M. Sprinzl and H. Staecker and K. Stephan and S.I. Usami and Y. Yanov and M.E. Zernotti and K. Zimmermann and A. Lorens and G. Mertens",

year = "2013",

doi = "10.3109/00016489.2013.869059",

language = "English",

volume = "133",

pages = "3--13",

journal = "Acta Oto-Laryngologica",

issn = "0001-6489",

publisher = "Informa Healthcare USA",

number = "S564",

}

Skarz̈yński, H, Van De Heyning, PH, Agrawal, S, Arauz, SL, Atlas, M, Baumgartner, WD, Caversaccio, MD, De Bodt, MS, Gavilan, J, Godey, B, Green, K, Gstöettner, WK, Hagen, R, Han, D, Kameswaran, M, Karltorp, E, Kompis, M, Kuzovkov, VE, Lassaletta, L, Levevre, F, Li, Y, Manikoth, M, Martin, JG, Mlynski, R, Mueller, J, O'Driscoll, MP, Parnes, LS, Prentiss, S, Pulibalathingal, S, Raine, CH, Rajan, G, Rajeswaran, R, Rivas, JA, Rivas, A, Skarzyński, PH, Sprinzl, GM, Staecker, H, Stephan, K, Usami, SI, Yanov, Y, Zernotti, ME, Zimmermann, K, Lorens, A & Mertens, G 2013, 'Towards a consensus on a hearing preservation classification system', Acta Oto-Laryngologica, vol. 133, no. S564, pp. 3-13. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489.2013.869059

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards a consensus on a hearing preservation classification system

AU - Skarz̈yński, H.

AU - Van De Heyning, P.H.

AU - Agrawal, S.

AU - Arauz, S.L.

AU - Atlas, Marcus

AU - Baumgartner, W.D.

AU - Caversaccio, M.D.

AU - De Bodt, M.S.

AU - Gavilan, J.

AU - Godey, B.

AU - Green, K.

AU - Gstöettner, W.K.

AU - Hagen, R.

AU - Han, D.

AU - Kameswaran, M.

AU - Karltorp, E.

AU - Kompis, M.

AU - Kuzovkov, V.E.

AU - Lassaletta, L.

AU - Levevre, F.

AU - Li, Y.

AU - Manikoth, M.

AU - Martin, J.G.

AU - Mlynski, R.

AU - Mueller, J.

AU - O'Driscoll, M.P.

AU - Parnes, L.S.

AU - Prentiss, S.

AU - Pulibalathingal, S.

AU - Raine, C.H.

AU - Rajan, Gunesh

AU - Rajeswaran, R.

AU - Rivas, J.A.

AU - Rivas, A.

AU - Skarzyński, P.H.

AU - Sprinzl, G.M.

AU - Staecker, H.

AU - Stephan, K.

AU - Usami, S.I.

AU - Yanov, Y.

AU - Zernotti, M.E.

AU - Zimmermann, K.

AU - Lorens, A.

AU - Mertens, G.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Conclusion: The comprehensive Hearing Preservation classification system presented in this paper is suitable for use for all cochlear implant users with measurable pre-operative residual hearing. If adopted as a universal reporting standard, as it was designed to be, it should prove highly beneficial by enabling future studies to quickly and easily compare the results of previous studies and meta-analyze their data. Objectives: To develop a comprehensive Hearing Preservation classification system suitable for use for all cochlear implant users with measurable pre-operative residual hearing. Methods: The HEARRING group discussed and reviewed a number of different propositions of a HP classification systems and reviewed critical appraisals to develop a qualitative system in accordance with the prerequisites. Results: The Hearing Preservation Classification System proposed herein fulfills the following necessary criteria: 1) classification is independent from users' initial hearing, 2) it is appropriate for all cochlear implant users with measurable pre-operative residual hearing, 3) it covers the whole range of pure tone average from 0 to 120 dB; 4) it is easy to use and easy to understand. © 2013 Informa Healthcare.

AB - Conclusion: The comprehensive Hearing Preservation classification system presented in this paper is suitable for use for all cochlear implant users with measurable pre-operative residual hearing. If adopted as a universal reporting standard, as it was designed to be, it should prove highly beneficial by enabling future studies to quickly and easily compare the results of previous studies and meta-analyze their data. Objectives: To develop a comprehensive Hearing Preservation classification system suitable for use for all cochlear implant users with measurable pre-operative residual hearing. Methods: The HEARRING group discussed and reviewed a number of different propositions of a HP classification systems and reviewed critical appraisals to develop a qualitative system in accordance with the prerequisites. Results: The Hearing Preservation Classification System proposed herein fulfills the following necessary criteria: 1) classification is independent from users' initial hearing, 2) it is appropriate for all cochlear implant users with measurable pre-operative residual hearing, 3) it covers the whole range of pure tone average from 0 to 120 dB; 4) it is easy to use and easy to understand. © 2013 Informa Healthcare.

U2 - 10.3109/00016489.2013.869059

DO - 10.3109/00016489.2013.869059

M3 - Article

SN - 0001-6489

VL - 133

SP - 3

EP - 13

JO - Acta Oto-Laryngologica

JF - Acta Oto-Laryngologica

IS - S564

ER -

Towards a consensus on a hearing preservation classification system

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this