TY - JOUR
T1 - Toward a theory-based specification of non-pharmacological treatments in aging and dementia
T2 - Focused reviews and methodological recommendations
AU - ISTAART Non-pharmacological Interventions Professional Interest Area
AU - Sikkes, Sietske A.M.
AU - Tang, Yi
AU - Jutten, Roos J.
AU - Wesselman, Linda M.P.
AU - Turkstra, Lyn S.
AU - Brodaty, Henry
AU - Clare, Linda
AU - Cassidy-Eagle, Erin
AU - Cox, Kay L.
AU - Chételat, Gaël
AU - Dautricourt, Sophie
AU - Dhana, Klodian
AU - Dodge, Hiroko
AU - Dröes, Rose Marie
AU - Hampstead, Benjamin M.
AU - Holland, Thomas
AU - Lampit, Amit
AU - Laver, Kate
AU - Lutz, Antoine
AU - Lautenschlager, Nicola T.
AU - McCurry, Susan M.
AU - Meiland, Franka J.M.
AU - Morris, Martha Clare
AU - Mueller, Kimberly D.
AU - Peters, Ruth
AU - Ridel, Gemma
AU - Spector, Aimee
AU - van der Steen, Jenny T.
AU - Tamplin, Jeanette
AU - Thompson, Zara
AU - Bahar-Fuchs, Alex
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - Introduction: Non-pharmacological treatments (NPTs) have the potential to improve meaningful outcomes for older people at risk of, or living with dementia, but research often lacks methodological rigor and continues to produce mixed results. Methods: In the current position paper, experts in NPT research have specified treatment targets, aims, and ingredients using an umbrella framework, the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System. Results: Experts provided a snapshot and an authoritative summary of the evidence for different NPTs based on the best synthesis efforts, identified main gaps in knowledge and relevant barriers, and provided directions for future research. Experts in trial methodology provide best practice principles and recommendations for those working in this area, underscoring the importance of prespecified protocols. Discussion: We conclude that the evidence strongly supports various NPTs in relation to their primary targets, and discuss opportunities and challenges associated with a unifying theoretical framework to guide future efforts in this area.
AB - Introduction: Non-pharmacological treatments (NPTs) have the potential to improve meaningful outcomes for older people at risk of, or living with dementia, but research often lacks methodological rigor and continues to produce mixed results. Methods: In the current position paper, experts in NPT research have specified treatment targets, aims, and ingredients using an umbrella framework, the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System. Results: Experts provided a snapshot and an authoritative summary of the evidence for different NPTs based on the best synthesis efforts, identified main gaps in knowledge and relevant barriers, and provided directions for future research. Experts in trial methodology provide best practice principles and recommendations for those working in this area, underscoring the importance of prespecified protocols. Discussion: We conclude that the evidence strongly supports various NPTs in relation to their primary targets, and discuss opportunities and challenges associated with a unifying theoretical framework to guide future efforts in this area.
KW - cognitive rehabilitation
KW - cognitive stimulation therapy
KW - cognitive training
KW - cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia
KW - communication treatments
KW - framework
KW - meditation
KW - mild cognitive impairment
KW - multisensory treatments
KW - music-based treatments
KW - neuromodulation
KW - neuropsychiatric
KW - non-pharmacological
KW - nutritional interventions
KW - occupational therapy
KW - physical exercise training
KW - reminiscence therapy
KW - subjective cognitive decline
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096689259&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/alz.12188
DO - 10.1002/alz.12188
M3 - Article
C2 - 33215876
AN - SCOPUS:85096689259
SN - 1552-5260
VL - 17
SP - 255
EP - 270
JO - Alzheimer's and Dementia
JF - Alzheimer's and Dementia
IS - 2
ER -