Touch in health professional practice: a review

Lorna Davin, Jill Thistlethwaite, Emma Bartle, Kylie Russell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The appropriate use of touch is central to effective and compassionate care in the clinical environment; however, in a time of the #MeToo movement, and with heightened awareness of child and elder abuse, the notion of physical contact is frequently viewed negatively, and may be associated with gender and power divides. Methods: We reviewed relevant literature, including textbooks, and have drawn on our own experiences to explore the concept and use of touch across medicine, nursing and dentistry. Results: In the context of learning and teaching in health we recognised two types of physical touch: expressive and procedural. Discussion: Our review legitimises the importance of learners and educators being equipped to consider the role and nuances of touch when engaging in professional behaviour. We provide suggestions for how this complex concept may be embedded into entry-to-practice curricula and approached in faculty development.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)559-564
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Teacher
Volume16
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Touch in health professional practice: a review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this