To test, or not to test: that is the question for the future of lipoprotein(a)

Katrina L. Ellis, Anindita Chakraborty, Eric K. Moses, Gerald F. Watts

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a potent, highly heritable and common risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Evidence for a causal association between elevated Lp(a) and ASCVD has been provided by large epidemiological investigations that have demonstrated a curvilinear association with increased risk, as well as from genetic examinations and cellular and transgenic animal studies. Although there are several therapies available for lowering Lp(a), none are selective for Lp(a) and there is no clinical trial data that has specifically shown that lowering Lp(a) reduces the risk of ASCVD. Hence, screening for elevated Lp(a) is not routinely incorporated into clinical practice. Areas covered: This paper reviews the current evidence supporting the causal role of Lp(a) in the primary and secondary prevention of ASCVD, screening approaches for high Lp(a), current guidelines on testing Lp(a), and barriers to the routine screening of elevated Lp(a) in clinical practice. Expert opinion: At present, there is a moderate level of evidence supporting the routine screening of elevated Lp(a). Current guidelines recommend testing for elevated Lp(a) in individuals at intermediate or high risk of ASCVD.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)241-250
Number of pages10
JournalExpert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 3 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'To test, or not to test: that is the question for the future of lipoprotein(a)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this