There is no (legal) alternative: Codifying economic ideology into law

Marco Rizzi, Benjamin Farrand

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference paperChapter

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to further explore the nature of ‘crisis’, and how the incorporation of an economic ideology as ‘solution’ to that crisis in the form of legally binding obligations restricts the ability to pursue alternative courses of action, creating tensions within society. Focusing upon economic doctrine as reflecting ideological positions, the authors consider the way in which the framing of events as ‘crises’, and thereby establishing them as threats to the current political and economic system, enables political actors to facilitate changes that may not otherwise be politically feasible. In particular, by responding to a crisis through the creation of laws that codify an ideologically guided economic doctrine, a temporary state of crisis creates a permanent legal set of obligations. The authors draw from a social constructivist perspective, highlighting the importance of ideas as a means of interpreting events, and combining analysis of structural economic changes with the role of actors in creating framing narratives surrounding such changes. The proposed thesis holds that while structural changes are analytically observable, there is no single true narrative of social reality, but instead competing and contestable truth claims about the social or political origins of events and their consequences. It also expands upon how economic theories reflect ideologically oriented perceptions of the truth of our social and economic world. This theoretical hybrid is effective in describing the complex variety of factors contributing to the understanding of how events can be framed so as to make specific policy choices legally binding – while there may be alternative policy options, there is no legal alternative.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Crisis Behind the Euro-Crisis
Subtitle of host publicationThe Euro-Crisis as a Multi-Dimensional Systemic Crisis of the EU
EditorsEva Nanopoulos, Fotis Vergis
PublisherCambridge University Press
Chapter1
ISBN (Electronic)9781108598859
ISBN (Print)9781108470346
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2019

Fingerprint

ideology
Law
event
economics
doctrine
obligation
narrative
social reality
political actor
economic system
economic theory
economic change
structural change
political system
threat
ability

Cite this

Rizzi, M., & Farrand, B. (Accepted/In press). There is no (legal) alternative: Codifying economic ideology into law. In E. Nanopoulos, & F. Vergis (Eds.), The Crisis Behind the Euro-Crisis: The Euro-Crisis as a Multi-Dimensional Systemic Crisis of the EU Cambridge University Press.
Rizzi, Marco ; Farrand, Benjamin . / There is no (legal) alternative : Codifying economic ideology into law. The Crisis Behind the Euro-Crisis: The Euro-Crisis as a Multi-Dimensional Systemic Crisis of the EU. editor / Eva Nanopoulos ; Fotis Vergis. Cambridge University Press, 2019.
@inbook{72212480665c44298c48d0ed6c81576e,
title = "There is no (legal) alternative: Codifying economic ideology into law",
abstract = "The purpose of this chapter is to further explore the nature of ‘crisis’, and how the incorporation of an economic ideology as ‘solution’ to that crisis in the form of legally binding obligations restricts the ability to pursue alternative courses of action, creating tensions within society. Focusing upon economic doctrine as reflecting ideological positions, the authors consider the way in which the framing of events as ‘crises’, and thereby establishing them as threats to the current political and economic system, enables political actors to facilitate changes that may not otherwise be politically feasible. In particular, by responding to a crisis through the creation of laws that codify an ideologically guided economic doctrine, a temporary state of crisis creates a permanent legal set of obligations. The authors draw from a social constructivist perspective, highlighting the importance of ideas as a means of interpreting events, and combining analysis of structural economic changes with the role of actors in creating framing narratives surrounding such changes. The proposed thesis holds that while structural changes are analytically observable, there is no single true narrative of social reality, but instead competing and contestable truth claims about the social or political origins of events and their consequences. It also expands upon how economic theories reflect ideologically oriented perceptions of the truth of our social and economic world. This theoretical hybrid is effective in describing the complex variety of factors contributing to the understanding of how events can be framed so as to make specific policy choices legally binding – while there may be alternative policy options, there is no legal alternative.",
author = "Marco Rizzi and Benjamin Farrand",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781108470346",
editor = "Eva Nanopoulos and Fotis Vergis",
booktitle = "The Crisis Behind the Euro-Crisis",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Rizzi, M & Farrand, B 2019, There is no (legal) alternative: Codifying economic ideology into law. in E Nanopoulos & F Vergis (eds), The Crisis Behind the Euro-Crisis: The Euro-Crisis as a Multi-Dimensional Systemic Crisis of the EU. Cambridge University Press.

There is no (legal) alternative : Codifying economic ideology into law. / Rizzi, Marco; Farrand, Benjamin .

The Crisis Behind the Euro-Crisis: The Euro-Crisis as a Multi-Dimensional Systemic Crisis of the EU. ed. / Eva Nanopoulos; Fotis Vergis. Cambridge University Press, 2019.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference paperChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - There is no (legal) alternative

T2 - Codifying economic ideology into law

AU - Rizzi, Marco

AU - Farrand, Benjamin

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - The purpose of this chapter is to further explore the nature of ‘crisis’, and how the incorporation of an economic ideology as ‘solution’ to that crisis in the form of legally binding obligations restricts the ability to pursue alternative courses of action, creating tensions within society. Focusing upon economic doctrine as reflecting ideological positions, the authors consider the way in which the framing of events as ‘crises’, and thereby establishing them as threats to the current political and economic system, enables political actors to facilitate changes that may not otherwise be politically feasible. In particular, by responding to a crisis through the creation of laws that codify an ideologically guided economic doctrine, a temporary state of crisis creates a permanent legal set of obligations. The authors draw from a social constructivist perspective, highlighting the importance of ideas as a means of interpreting events, and combining analysis of structural economic changes with the role of actors in creating framing narratives surrounding such changes. The proposed thesis holds that while structural changes are analytically observable, there is no single true narrative of social reality, but instead competing and contestable truth claims about the social or political origins of events and their consequences. It also expands upon how economic theories reflect ideologically oriented perceptions of the truth of our social and economic world. This theoretical hybrid is effective in describing the complex variety of factors contributing to the understanding of how events can be framed so as to make specific policy choices legally binding – while there may be alternative policy options, there is no legal alternative.

AB - The purpose of this chapter is to further explore the nature of ‘crisis’, and how the incorporation of an economic ideology as ‘solution’ to that crisis in the form of legally binding obligations restricts the ability to pursue alternative courses of action, creating tensions within society. Focusing upon economic doctrine as reflecting ideological positions, the authors consider the way in which the framing of events as ‘crises’, and thereby establishing them as threats to the current political and economic system, enables political actors to facilitate changes that may not otherwise be politically feasible. In particular, by responding to a crisis through the creation of laws that codify an ideologically guided economic doctrine, a temporary state of crisis creates a permanent legal set of obligations. The authors draw from a social constructivist perspective, highlighting the importance of ideas as a means of interpreting events, and combining analysis of structural economic changes with the role of actors in creating framing narratives surrounding such changes. The proposed thesis holds that while structural changes are analytically observable, there is no single true narrative of social reality, but instead competing and contestable truth claims about the social or political origins of events and their consequences. It also expands upon how economic theories reflect ideologically oriented perceptions of the truth of our social and economic world. This theoretical hybrid is effective in describing the complex variety of factors contributing to the understanding of how events can be framed so as to make specific policy choices legally binding – while there may be alternative policy options, there is no legal alternative.

UR - https://www.cambridge.org/au/academic/subjects/politics-international-relations/european-government-politics-and-policy/crisis-behind-eurocrisis-eurocrisis-multidimensional-systemic-crisis-eu?format=HB

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781108470346

BT - The Crisis Behind the Euro-Crisis

A2 - Nanopoulos, Eva

A2 - Vergis, Fotis

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -

Rizzi M, Farrand B. There is no (legal) alternative: Codifying economic ideology into law. In Nanopoulos E, Vergis F, editors, The Crisis Behind the Euro-Crisis: The Euro-Crisis as a Multi-Dimensional Systemic Crisis of the EU. Cambridge University Press. 2019