There is no benefit in using follicle density, secondary to primary follicle ratio or primary follicle density as additional selection criteria for Merino sheep

J.W. Skerritt

There is no benefit in using follicle density, secondary to primary follicle ratio or primary follicle density as additional selection criteria for Merino sheep

J.W. Skerritt

Graduate Research School

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference paper › Conference paper › peer-review

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Breeding for Quality and Profit
Place of Publication	Adelaide
Publisher	The Australian Association of Animal Breeding and Genetics
Pages	228-232
Volume	11
Publication status	Published - 1995
Event	There is no benefit in using follicle density, secondary to primary follicle ratio or primary follicle density as additional selection criteria for Merino sheep - Duration: 1 Jan 1995 → …

Conference

Conference	There is no benefit in using follicle density, secondary to primary follicle ratio or primary follicle density as additional selection criteria for Merino sheep
Period	1/01/95 → …

Cite this

@inproceedings{001c42d4749f4a74beadcd863ecd3f9e,

title = "There is no benefit in using follicle density, secondary to primary follicle ratio or primary follicle density as additional selection criteria for Merino sheep",

author = "J.W. Skerritt",

year = "1995",

language = "English",

volume = "11",

pages = "228--232",

booktitle = "Breeding for Quality and Profit",

publisher = "The Australian Association of Animal Breeding and Genetics",

note = "There is no benefit in using follicle density, secondary to primary follicle ratio or primary follicle density as additional selection criteria for Merino sheep ; Conference date: 01-01-1995",

}

Skerritt, JW 1995, There is no benefit in using follicle density, secondary to primary follicle ratio or primary follicle density as additional selection criteria for Merino sheep. in Breeding for Quality and Profit. vol. 11, The Australian Association of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Adelaide, pp. 228-232, There is no benefit in using follicle density, secondary to primary follicle ratio or primary follicle density as additional selection criteria for Merino sheep, 1/01/95.

There is no benefit in using follicle density, secondary to primary follicle ratio or primary follicle density as additional selection criteria for Merino sheep. / Skerritt, J.W.
Breeding for Quality and Profit. Vol. 11 Adelaide: The Australian Association of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 1995. p. 228-232.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference paper › Conference paper › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - There is no benefit in using follicle density, secondary to primary follicle ratio or primary follicle density as additional selection criteria for Merino sheep

AU - Skerritt, J.W.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

M3 - Conference paper

VL - 11

SP - 228

EP - 232

BT - Breeding for Quality and Profit

PB - The Australian Association of Animal Breeding and Genetics

CY - Adelaide

T2 - There is no benefit in using follicle density, secondary to primary follicle ratio or primary follicle density as additional selection criteria for Merino sheep

Y2 - 1 January 1995

ER -