The use of topical nonabsorable gastrointestinal antifungal prophylaxis to prevent fungal infections in critically ill immunocompetent patients : A meta-analysis

K.M. Ho, S.A. Rochford, Geoffrey Dobb

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    14 Citations (Scopus)


    Objective: To investigate the preventive effect of topical nonabsorbable gastrointestinal antifungal prophylaxis on the incidence of fungal infection in critically ill immunocompetent patients.Data Source: Randomized controlled studies involving critically ill pediatric and adult patients in different languages from the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register (2004, issue 1), EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases (1966 to 30 April 2004) were included. Studies evaluating absorbable antifungal prophylaxis were excluded. Two reviewers assessed the quality of the studies and performed data extraction independently.Data: Amphotericin B and nystatin were used as the nonabsorbable antifungal prophylaxis in the 15 studies included in this meta-analysis. Ten studies used a concomitant systemic antibiotic and four more studies used concomitant topical nonabsorbable antibiotics in the treatment group. Only one study compared topical nonabsorbable antifungal prophylaxis alone with placebo. The total incidence of fungal infections (relative risk [RR], 0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.48; p < .00001; extent of inconsistency [I-2] = 0%) and proportion of patients with fungal infection (RR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.28-0.87; p = .02; I-2 = 0%) were significantly reduced with topical nonabsorbable antifungal pro- phylaxis. The incidence of fungal urinary tract infection was significantly reduced (RR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.10-0.74; p = .01; I-2 = 0%) but not fungal pneumonia (RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.28-1.16; p = .12; I-2 = 0%). Fungemia and catheter-related fungal sepsis were rare and not significantly reduced with nonabsorbable antifungal prophylaxis. The results remained unchanged in the sensitivity analyses after exclusion of studies with unclear study quality or exclusion of the contribution of fungal urinary tract infections to the total incidence of fungal infections.Conclusions: In critically ill immunocompetent patients who are at high risk of fungal infection, topical nonabsorbable gastrointestinal antifungal prophylaxis was associated with a reduced incidence of urinary fungal infections and a trend toward reduction in respiratory fungal infections and fungemia. Limitations in study data are such that many of these infections may have represented superficial infections of uncertain clinical importance; a large, randomized, controlled trial is needed to assess the cost-effectiveness and safety of topical nonabsorbable antifungal prophylaxis in critically ill patients.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)2383-2392
    JournalCritical Care Medicine
    Issue number10
    Publication statusPublished - 2005


    Dive into the research topics of 'The use of topical nonabsorable gastrointestinal antifungal prophylaxis to prevent fungal infections in critically ill immunocompetent patients : A meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this