TY - JOUR
T1 - The Role of Primary Care Physicians in Childhood Cancer Survivorship Care
T2 - Multiperspective Interviews
AU - on behalf of the ANZCHOG Survivorship Study Group
AU - Signorelli, Christina
AU - Wakefield, Claire E.
AU - Fardell, Joanna E.
AU - Foreman, Tali
AU - Johnston, Karen A.
AU - Emery, Jon
AU - Thornton-Benko, Elysia
AU - Girgis, Afaf
AU - Lie, Hanne C.
AU - Cohn, Richard J.
AU - Graham, Kerrie
AU - Walwyn, Thomas
N1 - Funding Information:
We acknowledge the contribution of Barbora Pekarova, Amanda Tillmann, Vivian Nguyen, Brittany McGill, Janine Vetsch, Kate Hetherington, Rebecca Hill, and Mary-Ellen Brierley. We also thank the survivors, parents, and primary care physicians that participated as well as each of the recruiting sites for the ANZCHOG Survivorship Study, including Sydney Children's Hospital Randwick, the Children's Hospital at Westmead, John Hunter Children's Hospital, the Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Monash Children's Hospital Melbourne, Royal Children's Hospital Brisbane, Princess Margaret Children's Hospital, Women's and Children's Hospital Adelaide, and in New Zealand, Starship Children's Health, Wellington Hospital, and Christchurch hospital. The members of the ANZCHOG Survivorship Study Group in alphabetical order: Dr. Frank Alvaro, Prof. Richard J. Cohn, Dr. Rob Corbett, Dr. Peter Downie, Karen Egan, Sarah Ellis, Prof. Jon Emery, Dr. Joanna E. Fardell, Tali Foreman, Dr. Melissa Gabriel, Prof. Afaf Girgis, Kerrie Graham, Karen A. Johnston, Dr. Janelle Jones, Dr. Liane Lockwood, Dr. Ann Maguire, Dr. Maria McCarthy, Dr. Jordana McLoone, Dr. Francoise Mechinaud, Sinead Molloy, Lyndal Moore, Dr. Michael Osborn, Christina Signorelli, Dr. Jane Skeen, Dr. Heather Tapp, Tracy Till, Jo Truscott, Kate Turpin, Prof. Claire E. Wakefield, Dr. Thomas Walwyn, and Kathy Yallop. The Behavioural Sciences Unit is proudly supported by the Kids with Cancer Foundation. C.S. and J.E.F. are supported by The Kids? Cancer Project. C.E.W. is supported by a Career Development Fellowship from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (APP1067501). A.G. is funded through Cancer Institute NSW grants. The BSU's survivorship research program is funded by the Kids Cancer Alliance, The Kids? Cancer Project and a Cancer Council NSW Program Grant (PG16-02) with the support of the Estate of the Late Harry McPaul. These funding bodies did not have any role in the study design, data collection and analysis, manuscript writing, or the decision to publish.
Publisher Copyright:
© AlphaMed Press 2018
PY - 2019/5/1
Y1 - 2019/5/1
N2 - Background: Primary care physicians (PCPs) are well placed to provide holistic care to survivors of childhood cancer and may relieve growing pressures on specialist-led follow-up. We evaluated PCPs' role and confidence in providing follow-up care to survivors of childhood cancer. Subjects, Materials, and Methods: In Stage 1, survivors and parents (of young survivors) from 11 Australian and New Zealand hospitals completed interviews about their PCPs' role in their follow-up. Participants nominated their PCP for an interview for Stage 2. In Stage 2, PCPs completed interviews about their confidence and preparedness in delivering childhood cancer survivorship care. Results: Stage 1: One hundred twenty survivors (36% male, mean age: 25.6 years) and parents of young survivors (58% male survivors, survivors' mean age: 12.7 years) completed interviews. Few survivors (23%) and parents (10%) visited their PCP for cancer-related care and reported similar reasons for not seeking PCP-led follow-up including low confidence in PCPs (48%), low perceived PCP cancer knowledge (38%), and difficulty finding good/regular PCPs (31%). Participants indicated feeling "disconnected" from their PCP during their cancer treatment phase. Stage 2: Fifty-one PCPs (57% male, mean years practicing: 28.3) completed interviews. Fifty percent of PCPs reported feeling confident providing care to childhood cancer survivors. PCPs had high unmet information needs relating to survivors' late effects risks (94%) and preferred a highly prescriptive approach to improve their confidence delivering survivorship care. Conclusion: Improved communication and greater PCP involvement during treatment/early survivorship may help overcome survivors' and parents' low confidence in PCPs. PCPs are willing but require clear guidance from tertiary providers. Implications for Practice: Childhood cancer survivors and their parents have low confidence in primary care physicians' ability to manage their survivorship care. Encouraging engagement in primary care is important to promote holistic follow-up care, continuity of care, and long-term surveillance. Survivors'/parents' confidence in physicians may be improved by better involving primary care physicians throughout treatment and early survivorship, and by introducing the concept of eventual transition to adult and primary services. Although physicians are willing to deliver childhood cancer survivorship care, their confidence in doing so may be improved through better communication with tertiary services and more appropriate training.
AB - Background: Primary care physicians (PCPs) are well placed to provide holistic care to survivors of childhood cancer and may relieve growing pressures on specialist-led follow-up. We evaluated PCPs' role and confidence in providing follow-up care to survivors of childhood cancer. Subjects, Materials, and Methods: In Stage 1, survivors and parents (of young survivors) from 11 Australian and New Zealand hospitals completed interviews about their PCPs' role in their follow-up. Participants nominated their PCP for an interview for Stage 2. In Stage 2, PCPs completed interviews about their confidence and preparedness in delivering childhood cancer survivorship care. Results: Stage 1: One hundred twenty survivors (36% male, mean age: 25.6 years) and parents of young survivors (58% male survivors, survivors' mean age: 12.7 years) completed interviews. Few survivors (23%) and parents (10%) visited their PCP for cancer-related care and reported similar reasons for not seeking PCP-led follow-up including low confidence in PCPs (48%), low perceived PCP cancer knowledge (38%), and difficulty finding good/regular PCPs (31%). Participants indicated feeling "disconnected" from their PCP during their cancer treatment phase. Stage 2: Fifty-one PCPs (57% male, mean years practicing: 28.3) completed interviews. Fifty percent of PCPs reported feeling confident providing care to childhood cancer survivors. PCPs had high unmet information needs relating to survivors' late effects risks (94%) and preferred a highly prescriptive approach to improve their confidence delivering survivorship care. Conclusion: Improved communication and greater PCP involvement during treatment/early survivorship may help overcome survivors' and parents' low confidence in PCPs. PCPs are willing but require clear guidance from tertiary providers. Implications for Practice: Childhood cancer survivors and their parents have low confidence in primary care physicians' ability to manage their survivorship care. Encouraging engagement in primary care is important to promote holistic follow-up care, continuity of care, and long-term surveillance. Survivors'/parents' confidence in physicians may be improved by better involving primary care physicians throughout treatment and early survivorship, and by introducing the concept of eventual transition to adult and primary services. Although physicians are willing to deliver childhood cancer survivorship care, their confidence in doing so may be improved through better communication with tertiary services and more appropriate training.
KW - Barriers
KW - Childhood cancer
KW - Confidence
KW - Follow-up care
KW - Primary care
KW - Transition
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053272164&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0103
DO - 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0103
M3 - Article
C2 - 30171066
SN - 1083-7159
VL - 24
SP - 710
EP - 719
JO - The Oncologist
JF - The Oncologist
IS - 5
ER -